-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
compiletest: Don't panic on unknown JSON-like output lines #129049
Conversation
This function is called for both compiler and non-compiler output, so if the line isn't recognized as JSON from the compiler then just print it as-is.
The JSON messages parsed by this file are from the _compiler_, not from libtest.
Some changes occurred in src/tools/compiletest cc @jieyouxu |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The existing code here is extremely hacky and fragile, but not panicking here seems okay to me.
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ | |||
//! These structs are a subset of the ones found in `rustc_errors::json`. | |||
//! They are only used for deserialization of JSON output provided by libtest. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remark: you are right, this is wrong; it's not libtest, it's not just compiler, it's also rustdoc and maybe even more.
Thanks for the fix! r? jieyouxu |
compiletest: Don't panic on unknown JSON-like output lines The `json::extract_rendered` function is called for both compiler output and non-compiler output, so it's inappropriate to panic just because a line starting with `{` didn't contain a compiler output message. It is called from two places: when checking the output of a `ui` test process, and when printing the output of an arbitrary non-passing `ProcRes`. So unfortunately there's currently no easy way to know for sure whether it is seeing compiler output or not. Fortunately, neither call site appears to be relying on this panic; it's just an overzealous internal check. Fixes rust-lang#126373.
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#127857 (Allow to customize `// TODO:` comment for deprecated safe autofix) - rust-lang#128410 (Migrate `remap-path-prefix-dwarf` `run-make` test to rmake) - rust-lang#128828 (`-Znext-solver` caching) - rust-lang#128873 (Add windows-targets crate to std's sysroot) - rust-lang#129034 (Add `#[must_use]` attribute to `Coroutine` trait) - rust-lang#129049 (compiletest: Don't panic on unknown JSON-like output lines) - rust-lang#129050 (Emit a warning instead of an error if `--generate-link-to-definition` is used with other output formats than HTML) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#122884 (Optimize integer `pow` by removing the exit branch) - rust-lang#127857 (Allow to customize `// TODO:` comment for deprecated safe autofix) - rust-lang#129034 (Add `#[must_use]` attribute to `Coroutine` trait) - rust-lang#129049 (compiletest: Don't panic on unknown JSON-like output lines) - rust-lang#129050 (Emit a warning instead of an error if `--generate-link-to-definition` is used with other output formats than HTML) - rust-lang#129056 (Fix one usage of target triple in bootstrap) - rust-lang#129058 (Add mw back to review rotation) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#122884 (Optimize integer `pow` by removing the exit branch) - rust-lang#127857 (Allow to customize `// TODO:` comment for deprecated safe autofix) - rust-lang#129034 (Add `#[must_use]` attribute to `Coroutine` trait) - rust-lang#129049 (compiletest: Don't panic on unknown JSON-like output lines) - rust-lang#129050 (Emit a warning instead of an error if `--generate-link-to-definition` is used with other output formats than HTML) - rust-lang#129056 (Fix one usage of target triple in bootstrap) - rust-lang#129058 (Add mw back to review rotation) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#122884 (Optimize integer `pow` by removing the exit branch) - rust-lang#127857 (Allow to customize `// TODO:` comment for deprecated safe autofix) - rust-lang#129034 (Add `#[must_use]` attribute to `Coroutine` trait) - rust-lang#129049 (compiletest: Don't panic on unknown JSON-like output lines) - rust-lang#129050 (Emit a warning instead of an error if `--generate-link-to-definition` is used with other output formats than HTML) - rust-lang#129056 (Fix one usage of target triple in bootstrap) - rust-lang#129058 (Add mw back to review rotation) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of rust-lang#129049 - Zalathar:json-like, r=jieyouxu compiletest: Don't panic on unknown JSON-like output lines The `json::extract_rendered` function is called for both compiler output and non-compiler output, so it's inappropriate to panic just because a line starting with `{` didn't contain a compiler output message. It is called from two places: when checking the output of a `ui` test process, and when printing the output of an arbitrary non-passing `ProcRes`. So unfortunately there's currently no easy way to know for sure whether it is seeing compiler output or not. Fortunately, neither call site appears to be relying on this panic; it's just an overzealous internal check. Fixes rust-lang#126373.
The
json::extract_rendered
function is called for both compiler output and non-compiler output, so it's inappropriate to panic just because a line starting with{
didn't contain a compiler output message.It is called from two places: when checking the output of a
ui
test process, and when printing the output of an arbitrary non-passingProcRes
. So unfortunately there's currently no easy way to know for sure whether it is seeing compiler output or not. Fortunately, neither call site appears to be relying on this panic; it's just an overzealous internal check.Fixes #126373.