-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert space-saving operations #130940
Merged
bors
merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
workingjubilee:remove-space-saving-operations
Sep 28, 2024
Merged
Revert space-saving operations #130940
bors
merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
workingjubilee:remove-space-saving-operations
Sep 28, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This reverts commit 06f49f6.
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-infra
Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Sep 27, 2024
@bors try |
Kobzol
reviewed
Sep 27, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2024
…perations, r=<try> Revert space-saving operations The "all of our artifacts" `mv` seems like it may save enough space to matter sometimes, since it can range up to a gigabyte of difference, if memory serves. For the rest, I think we're good. try-job: dist-aarch64-apple
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This partially reverts commit fe7c97c. I kept a mv, not a cp, for the one that shuffles major artifacts around, because the size of those artifacts are big enough to matter, sometimes. I don't think the diagnostic info will be that heavy, by comparison.
workingjubilee
force-pushed
the
remove-space-saving-operations
branch
from
September 27, 2024 19:03
1220721
to
a2a4ea0
Compare
@bors try |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2024
…perations, r=<try> Revert space-saving operations The "all of our artifacts" `mv` seems like it may save enough space to matter sometimes, since it can range up to a gigabyte of difference, if memory serves. For the rest, I think we're good. try-job: dist-aarch64-apple
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Sep 27, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#125404 (Fix `read_buf` uses in `std`) - rust-lang#130866 (Allow instantiating object trait binder when upcasting) - rust-lang#130922 (Reference UNSPECIFIED instead of INADDR_ANY in join_multicast_v4) - rust-lang#130924 (Make clashing_extern_declarations considering generic args for ADT field) - rust-lang#130939 (rustdoc: update `ProcMacro` docs section on helper attributes) - rust-lang#130940 (Revert space-saving operations) - rust-lang#130944 (Allow instantiating trait object binder in ptr-to-ptr casts) - rust-lang#130953 (Rename a few tests to make tidy happier) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#130940 - workingjubilee:remove-space-saving-operations, r=Kobzol Revert space-saving operations The "all of our artifacts" `mv` seems like it may save enough space to matter sometimes, since it can range up to a gigabyte of difference, if memory serves. For the rest, I think we're good. try-job: dist-aarch64-apple
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-infra
Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The "all of our artifacts"
mv
seems like it may save enough space to matter sometimes, since it can range up to a gigabyte of difference, if memory serves. For the rest, I think we're good.r? @Kobzol
try-job: dist-aarch64-apple