-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 8 pull requests #132747
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 8 pull requests #132747
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ive support And retire the old `only-debug` directive which was ambiguous and only for std debug assertions.
And rename local variables and field names in bootstrap from `debug_assertions{,_std}` -> `{rustc,std}-debug-assertions` to avoid confusion where applicable.
that was introduced in llvm/llvm-project#112548
Add functions to retrieve function definitions and static items from all crates (local and external). For external crates, add a query to retrieve the number of defs in a foreign crate.
Set "symbol name" in raw-dylib import libraries to the decorated name `windows-rs` received a bug report that mixing raw-dylib generated and the Windows SDK import libraries was causing linker failures: <microsoft/windows-rs#3285> The root cause turned out to be rust-lang#124958, that is we are not including the decorated name in the import library and so the import name type is also not being correctly set. This change modifies the generation of import libraries to set the "symbol name" to the fully decorated name and correctly marks the import as being data vs function. Note that this also required some changes to how the symbol is named within Rust: for MSVC we now need to use the decorated name but for MinGW we still need to use partially decorated (or undecorated) name. Fixes rust-lang#124958 Passing i686 MSVC and MinGW build: <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/11000433888?pr=130586> r? `@ChrisDenton`
…onur-ozkan Add `{ignore,needs}-{rustc,std}-debug-assertions` directive support Add `{ignore,needs}-{rustc,std}-debug-assertions` compiletest directives and retire the old `{ignore,only}-debug` directives. The old `{ignore,only}-debug` directives were ambiguous because you could have std built with debug assertions but rustc not built with debug assertions or vice versa. If we want to support the use case of controlling test run based on if rustc was built with debug assertions, then having `{ignore,only}-debug` will be very confusing. cc `@matthiaskrgr` Closes rust-lang#123987. r? bootstrap (or compiler tbh)
…=pnkfelix Robustify and genericize return-type-notation resolution in `resolve_bound_vars` rust-lang#129629 implemented return-type-notation (RTN) in its path form, like `where T::method(..): Bound`. As part of lowering, we must record the late-bound vars for the where clause introduced by the method (namely, its early- and late-bound lifetime arguments, since `where T::method(..)` turns into a higher-ranked where clause over all of the lifetimes according to [RFC 3654](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3654-return-type-notation.html#converting-to-higher-ranked-trait-bounds)). However, this logic was only looking at the where clauses of the parent item that the `T::method(..)` bound was written on, and not any parent items. This PR generalizes that logic to look at the parent item (i.e. the outer impl or trait) instead and fixes a (debug only) assertion as an effect. This logic is also more general and likely easier to adapt to more interesting (though likely very far off) cases like non-lifetime binder `for<T: Trait> T::method(..): Send` bounds. Tracking: - rust-lang#109417
…iser Fix rust-lang#131977 parens mangled in shared mut static lint suggestion Resolves rust-lang#131977 for static mut references after discussion with Esteban & Jieyou on [t-compiler/help](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/linting.20with.20parens.20in.20the.20HIR). This doesn't do anything to change the underlying issue if there are other expressions that generate lint suggestions which need to be applied within parentheses.
…er-errors [StableMIR] API to retrieve definitions from crates Add functions to retrieve function definitions and static items from all crates (local and external). For external crates, we're still missing items from trait implementation and primitives. r? `@compiler-errors:` Do you know what is the best way to retrieve the associated items for primitives and trait implementations for external crates? Thanks!
…issing_symbol_issue, r=tgross35 Compile `test_num_f128` conditionally on `reliable_f128_math` config With rust-lang#132434 merged, our internal SGX CI started failing with: ``` 05:27:34 = note: rust-lld: error: undefined symbol: fmodl 05:27:34 >>> referenced by arith.rs:617 (core/src/ops/arith.rs:617) 05:27:34 >>> /home/jenkins/workspace/rust-sgx-ci/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-std/x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx/release/deps/std-5d5f11eb008c9091.std.d8141acc61ab7ac8-cgu.10.rcgu.o:(std::num::test_num::h7dd9449f6c01fde8) 05:27:34 >>> did you mean: fmodf 05:27:34 >>> defined in: /home/jenkins/workspace/rust-sgx-ci/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-std/x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx/release/deps/libcompiler_builtins-0376f439a2ebf305.rlib(compiler_builtins-0376f439a2ebf305.compiler_builtins.c22db39d25d6f802-cgu.148.rcgu.o) ``` This originated from the `test_num_f128` test not having the required conditional compilation. This PR fixes that issue. cc: `@jethrogb,` `@workingjubilee`
…, r=notriddle Fix `librustdoc/scrape_examples.rs` formatting Still working on the intra-doc link feature. This time I encountered this file and it bothered me a bit so fixing formatting. :3 r? `@notriddle`
Update test for LLVM 20's new vector splat syntax that was introduced in llvm/llvm-project#112548
rustbot
added
A-compiletest
Area: The compiletest test runner
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Nov 7, 2024
@bors r+ p=8 rollup=never |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Nov 7, 2024
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
@bors r- |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Nov 7, 2024
I think it's a bad PR mix-up. So closing this one and making a new one without #132047. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-compiletest
Area: The compiletest test runner
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
{ignore,needs}-{rustc,std}-debug-assertions
directive support #131913 (Add{ignore,needs}-{rustc,std}-debug-assertions
directive support)resolve_bound_vars
#132047 (Robustify and genericize return-type-notation resolution inresolve_bound_vars
)static_mut_refs
diagnostic suggestion #131977 parens mangled in shared mut static lint suggestion)test_num_f128
conditionally onreliable_f128_math
config #132696 (Compiletest_num_f128
conditionally onreliable_f128_math
config)librustdoc/scrape_examples.rs
formatting #132739 (Fixlibrustdoc/scrape_examples.rs
formatting)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup