-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add top level sections to the Unstable Book. #41295
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
e578268
to
4592345
Compare
4592345
to
952b14d
Compare
@@ -2,6 +2,3 @@ | |||
name = "tidy" | |||
version = "0.1.0" | |||
authors = ["Alex Crichton <[email protected]>"] | |||
|
|||
[dependencies] | |||
regex = "0.2" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like a Cargo.lock file here needs to be updated presumably because of this change.
952b14d
to
8dd523e
Compare
While we're doing this, should language features vs library features also happen? |
Yeah, I can do that. |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #41305) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
66aa506
to
ae71ca1
Compare
@steveklabnik How does this look? |
ae71ca1
to
400ed25
Compare
If anyone has any idea what's going on with the linkchecker here, please let me know |
400ed25
to
888bfa7
Compare
I fixed most of the tidy lint issues, I had to disable linkchecker for the Unstable Book (for now), since I'm using a subdirectory which mdbook uses The remaining issues are here:
These require changes upstream to the book and reference. What's the recommended approach? Set up redirects for everything? |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #40409) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
We say this PR is good to go, then you update the submodules in this PR and ship it together. let's do that |
Sooooo is this PR good to go? ;) I can take care of the merge conflict, though they're going to keep popping up until this (and the book/reference PRs) gets shipped |
Yes, conceptually this PR is good to go; as long as you can take care of all of it within this week (due to beta branching), then let's do it. |
888bfa7
to
fc62ba6
Compare
…teveklabnik Add top level sections to the Unstable Book. Prior to this commit, the contents of the Unstable Book were assumed to be unstable features. This commit moves features into 'language features' or 'library features' subsections. It also moves the 'linker_flavor' compiler flag into a new 'Compiler Flags' subsection. Even though it was helpful, I removed the tidy check that cross-references the SUMMARY.md links with the Unstable Book directory contents just because it would be difficult to maintain. Relevant PR: rust-lang#41142.
Prior to this commit, the contents of the Unstable Book were assumed to be unstable features. This commit moves features into 'language features' or 'library features' subsections. It also moves the 'linker_flavor' compiler flag into a new 'Compiler Flags' subsection. Even though it was helpful, I removed the tidy check that cross-references the SUMMARY.md links with the Unstable Book directory contents just because it would be difficult to maintain. Relevant PR: rust-lang#41142.
19851f4
to
bf202c8
Compare
@bors r=steveklabnik |
📌 Commit bf202c8 has been approved by |
…teveklabnik Add top level sections to the Unstable Book. Prior to this commit, the contents of the Unstable Book were assumed to be unstable features. This commit moves features into 'language features' or 'library features' subsections. It also moves the 'linker_flavor' compiler flag into a new 'Compiler Flags' subsection. Even though it was helpful, I removed the tidy check that cross-references the SUMMARY.md links with the Unstable Book directory contents just because it would be difficult to maintain. Relevant PR: rust-lang#41142.
@bors r- Likely responsible for #41387 (comment) |
📌 Commit 2e2a670 has been approved by |
…teveklabnik Add top level sections to the Unstable Book. Prior to this commit, the contents of the Unstable Book were assumed to be unstable features. This commit moves features into 'language features' or 'library features' subsections. It also moves the 'linker_flavor' compiler flag into a new 'Compiler Flags' subsection. Even though it was helpful, I removed the tidy check that cross-references the SUMMARY.md links with the Unstable Book directory contents just because it would be difficult to maintain. Relevant PR: rust-lang#41142.
…teveklabnik Add top level sections to the Unstable Book. Prior to this commit, the contents of the Unstable Book were assumed to be unstable features. This commit moves features into 'language features' or 'library features' subsections. It also moves the 'linker_flavor' compiler flag into a new 'Compiler Flags' subsection. Even though it was helpful, I removed the tidy check that cross-references the SUMMARY.md links with the Unstable Book directory contents just because it would be difficult to maintain. Relevant PR: rust-lang#41142.
Prior to this commit, the contents of the Unstable Book were assumed to
be unstable features. This commit moves features into 'language features'
or 'library features' subsections. It also moves the 'linker_flavor'
compiler flag into a new 'Compiler Flags' subsection.
Even though it was helpful, I removed the tidy check that
cross-references the SUMMARY.md links with the Unstable Book directory
contents just because it would be difficult to maintain.
Relevant PR: #41142.