Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not test RLS/Rustfmt if build failed #50123

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2018

Conversation

kennytm
Copy link
Member

@kennytm kennytm commented Apr 20, 2018

No description provided.

Avoid a tool being simultaneously test-pass and build-fail.
@kennytm
Copy link
Member Author

kennytm commented Apr 20, 2018

r? @alexcrichton

WIP: Verifying if the toolstate is correctly reported. RLS should be "build-fail" instead of "test-pass".

@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 20, 2018
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This looks great to me, thanks!

r=me when ready

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-gnu-tools of your PR failed on Travis (raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem.

Click to expand the log.

I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact @TimNN. (Feature Requests)

@kennytm kennytm force-pushed the do-not-test-rls-if-build-failed branch from ec2532a to 27d9691 Compare April 20, 2018 18:36
@kennytm
Copy link
Member Author

kennytm commented Apr 20, 2018

@bors r=alexcrichton

cc @nrc, this PR will make RLS "build-fail", which is the correct status and normal.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 20, 2018

📋 Looks like this PR is still in progress, ignoring approval

@kennytm kennytm changed the title [WIP] Do not test RLS/Rustfmt if build failed Do not test RLS/Rustfmt if build failed Apr 20, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 20, 2018

📌 Commit 27d9691 has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 20, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 22, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 27d9691 with merge 0cbd310...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2018
…xcrichton

Do not test RLS/Rustfmt if build failed
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 22, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing 0cbd310 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 27d9691 into rust-lang:master Apr 22, 2018
@kennytm-githubbot
Copy link

📣 Toolstate changed by #50123!

Tested on commit 0cbd310.
Direct link to PR: #50123

💔 rls on windows: test-pass → build-fail (cc @nrc).
💔 rls on linux: test-pass → build-fail (cc @nrc).

kennytm-githubbot added a commit to rust-lang-nursery/rust-toolstate that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2018
Tested on commit rust-lang/rust@0cbd310.
Direct link to PR: <rust-lang/rust#50123>

💔 rls on windows: test-pass → build-fail (cc @nrc).
💔 rls on linux: test-pass → build-fail (cc @nrc).
@ehuss ehuss mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2018
@kennytm kennytm deleted the do-not-test-rls-if-build-failed branch December 3, 2018 09:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants