Implement nth_back for RChunks(Exact)(Mut) #60555
Merged
+124
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Open
25 tasks
|
ping from triage @scottmcm waiting for your review on this |
|
@bors r+ rollup Sorry for the delay! |
|
📌 Commit 5eb0e08 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2019
…ottmcm Implement nth_back for RChunks(Exact)(Mut) Part of rust-lang#54054. These implementations may not be optimal because of the use of `self.len()`, but it's quite cheap and simplifies the code a lot. There's quite some duplication going on here, I wouldn't mind cleaning this up later. A good next step would probably be to add private `split_off_up_to`/`split_off_from` helper methods for slices since their behavior is commonly useful throughout the `Chunks` types. r? @scottmcm
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2019
…ottmcm Implement nth_back for RChunks(Exact)(Mut) Part of rust-lang#54054. These implementations may not be optimal because of the use of `self.len()`, but it's quite cheap and simplifies the code a lot. There's quite some duplication going on here, I wouldn't mind cleaning this up later. A good next step would probably be to add private `split_off_up_to`/`split_off_from` helper methods for slices since their behavior is commonly useful throughout the `Chunks` types. r? @scottmcm
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2019
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - #58975 (Implement `iter::Sum` and `iter::Product` for `Option`) - #60542 (Add Step::sub_usize) - #60555 (Implement nth_back for RChunks(Exact)(Mut)) - #60766 (Weak::into_raw) - #61048 (Feature/nth back chunks) - #61191 (librustc_errors: Move annotation collection to own impl) - #61235 (Stabilize bufreader_buffer feature) - #61249 (Rename Place::local to Place::local_or_deref_local) - #61291 (Avoid unneeded bug!() call) - #61294 (Rename `TraitOrImpl` to `Assoc` and `trait_or_impl` to `assoc`.) - #61297 (Remove LLVM instruction stats and other (obsolete) codegen stats.) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of #54054.
These implementations may not be optimal because of the use of
self.len(), but it's quite cheap and simplifies the code a lot.There's quite some duplication going on here, I wouldn't mind cleaning this up later. A good next step would probably be to add private
split_off_up_to/split_off_fromhelper methods for slices since their behavior is commonly useful throughout theChunkstypes.r? @scottmcm