-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In which we constantly improve the Vec(Deque) array PartialEq impls #63061
Conversation
@bors try |
In which we constantly improve the Vec(Deque) array PartialEq impls Use the same approach as in #62435 as sanctioned by #61415 (comment). r? @scottmcm
Diff looks good; r=me when you're through whatever perf stuff you're verifying. |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-azure |
@rust-timer build 39cf970 |
Argh... the timer bot seems broken... Let's not wait for it =P @bors r=scottmcm |
📌 Commit bfdfa85 has been approved by |
…ttmcm In which we constantly improve the Vec(Deque) array PartialEq impls Use the same approach as in rust-lang#62435 as sanctioned by rust-lang#61415 (comment). r? @scottmcm
…ttmcm In which we constantly improve the Vec(Deque) array PartialEq impls Use the same approach as in rust-lang#62435 as sanctioned by rust-lang#61415 (comment). r? @scottmcm
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #62550 (Implement RFC 2707 + Parser recovery for range patterns) - #62759 (Actually add rustc-guide to toolstate, don't fail builds for the guide) - #62806 (Fix few Clippy warnings) - #62974 (bump crossbeam-epoch dependency) - #63051 (Avoid ICE when referencing desugared local binding in borrow error) - #63061 (In which we constantly improve the Vec(Deque) array PartialEq impls) - #63067 (Add test for issue-50900) - #63071 (Allow rustbot to add `F-*` + `requires-nightly`.) Failed merges: r? @ghost
@rust-timer build 39cf970 |
Success: Queued 39cf970 with parent c798dff, comparison URL. |
Finished benchmarking try commit 39cf970, comparison URL. |
Nice; this caused some 0.5% to 2.2% improvements in some cases. 🎉 |
Use the same approach as in #62435 as sanctioned by #61415 (comment).
r? @scottmcm