-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify semantics of mem::zeroed #63215
Conversation
r? @dtolnay (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm happy with this but let's give @Centril a chance to react, too.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I had one job...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, except for the nit.
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 3725e35 has been approved by |
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #63107 (Added support for armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabi/musleabi) - #63121 (On `format!()` arg count mismatch provide extra info) - #63196 (build_helper: try less confusing method names) - #63206 (remove unsupported test case) - #63208 (Round generator sizes to a multiple of their alignment) - #63212 (Pretty print attributes in `print_arg`) - #63215 (Clarify semantics of mem::zeroed) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Clarifies the semantics of
mem::zeroed
.r? @Centril
cc @RalfJung