-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix liballoc test suite for Miri #76662
Conversation
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
r=me with CI passing. |
93361d2
to
bb41740
Compare
@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum rollup |
📌 Commit bb41740 has been approved by |
…lacrum Fix liballoc test suite for Miri Mostly, fix the regression introduced by rust-lang#75207 that caused slices (i.e., references) to be created to invalid memory or memory that has aliasing pointers that we want to keep valid. @dylni this changes the type of `check_range` to only require the length, not the full reference to the slice, which indeed is all the information this function requires. Also reduce the size of a test introduced in rust-lang#70793 to make it not take 3 minutes in Miri. This makes https://github.com/RalfJung/miri-test-libstd work again.
…lacrum Fix liballoc test suite for Miri Mostly, fix the regression introduced by rust-lang#75207 that caused slices (i.e., references) to be created to invalid memory or memory that has aliasing pointers that we want to keep valid. @dylni this changes the type of `check_range` to only require the length, not the full reference to the slice, which indeed is all the information this function requires. Also reduce the size of a test introduced in rust-lang#70793 to make it not take 3 minutes in Miri. This makes https://github.com/RalfJung/miri-test-libstd work again.
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #76311) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels:
|
bb41740
to
a2391d5
Compare
a2391d5
to
c528d24
Compare
@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum |
📌 Commit 7d67546 has been approved by |
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#76056 (Add more info for Vec Drain doc) - rust-lang#76062 (Vec slice example fix style and show type elision) - rust-lang#76262 (Use inline(never) instead of cold) - rust-lang#76335 (Make all methods of `Duration` unstably const) - rust-lang#76366 (Add Arith Tests in Library) - rust-lang#76369 (Move Various str tests in library) - rust-lang#76534 (Add doc comments for From impls) - rust-lang#76622 (Update bootstrap readme) - rust-lang#76641 (Some cleanup changes and commenting) - rust-lang#76662 (Fix liballoc test suite for Miri) Failed merges: r? `@ghost`
…-bounds, r=KodrAus Move `slice::check_range` to `RangeBounds` Since this method doesn't take a slice anymore (rust-lang#76662), it makes more sense to define it on `RangeBounds`. Questions: - Should the new method be `assert_len` or `assert_length`?
Mostly, fix the regression introduced by #75207 that caused slices (i.e., references) to be created to invalid memory or memory that has aliasing pointers that we want to keep valid. @dylni this changes the type of
check_range
to only require the length, not the full reference to the slice, which indeed is all the information this function requires.Also reduce the size of a test introduced in #70793 to make it not take 3 minutes in Miri.
This makes https://github.com/RalfJung/miri-test-libstd work again.