Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove redundant and unreliable coverage test results #80109

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2020

Conversation

richkadel
Copy link
Contributor

The coverage-reports tests still generate counters and JSON reports
for inspection, but these files are no longer used in Makefile diffs, to
reduce complexity and confusion from unreliable or unexpected test
results, especially when maintaining them (i.e., generating --blessed
results).

The associated expected_ files for counters and JSON reports have been
removed, leaving only the files actually used for testing: the llvm-cov show reports.

r? @tmandry

Tyler - as we discussed offline...

FYI: @wesleywiser @Swatinem

Arpad, depending on the timing of this PR, it may not affect you, but I'm removing some of the files that produce slightly different results on Windows as they really aren't necessary to validate coverage results.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 17, 2020
The `coverage-reports` tests still generate counters and JSON reports
for inspection, but these files are no longer used in Makefile diffs, to
reduce complexity and confusion from unreliable or unexpected test
results, especially when maintaining them (i.e., generating `--bless`ed
results).

The associated `expected_` files for counters and JSON reports have been
removed, leaving only the files actually used for testing: the `llvm-cov
show` reports.
@richkadel richkadel force-pushed the llvm-coverage-counters-2.3.0 branch from 8dd2d24 to c9fab50 Compare December 17, 2020 06:25
@tmandry
Copy link
Member

tmandry commented Dec 17, 2020

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 17, 2020

📌 Commit c9fab50 has been approved by tmandry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 17, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2020
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#78164 (Prefer regions with an `external_name` in `approx_universal_upper_bound`)
 - rust-lang#80003 (Fix overflow when converting ZST Vec to VecDeque)
 - rust-lang#80023 (Enhance error message when misspelled label to value in break expression)
 - rust-lang#80046 (Add more documentation to `Diagnostic` and `DiagnosticBuilder`)
 - rust-lang#80109 (Remove redundant and unreliable coverage test results)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit f44c227 into rust-lang:master Dec 18, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.50.0 milestone Dec 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants