Add SAFETY comments to core::slice::sort::partition_in_blocks #88291
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
C-cleanup
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Mark-Simulacrum (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
library/core/src/slice/sort.rs
Outdated
| l = unsafe { l.offset(block_l as isize) }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if start_r == end_r { | ||
| // All out-of-order elements in the right block were moved. Move to the previous block. | ||
|
|
||
| // SAFETY: Same argument as above. Either this is a full block `2*BLOCK`-wide, or `block_r` has |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a small nit: if can be unclear if this refers to the previous comment or the previous Safety comment. I don't have a link but you can "name" the referred comment something like this:
// a-somewhat-logical-name
// SAFETY: expl
...
// SAFETY: expl
// also refer to comment [a-somewhat-logical-name] for more reasons
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 08452ba83721620b03829d8b3c3686348d3e84e0 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
mdsn
force-pushed
the
partition-in-blocks-safety
branch
from
08452ba to
09e02a8
Compare
|
Sorry @Mark-Simulacrum I didn't see you approved the PR before and just force-pushed a squashed single commit. Will this cause a problem? |
|
@bors r+ rollup Thanks! Just need to reapprove, no problem. |
|
📌 Commit 09e02a8 has been approved by |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2021
…eulArtichaut Rollup of 16 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#87944 (add Cell::as_array_of_cells, similar to Cell::as_slice_of_cells) - rust-lang#88156 (Adjust / fix documentation of `Arc::make_mut`) - rust-lang#88157 (bootstrap.py: recognize riscv64 when auto-detect) - rust-lang#88196 (Refactor `named_asm_labels` to a HIR lint) - rust-lang#88218 (Remove `Session.trait_methods_not_found`) - rust-lang#88223 (Remove the `TryV2` alias) - rust-lang#88226 (Fix typo “a Rc” → “an Rc” (and a few more)) - rust-lang#88267 (2229: Update signature for truncate function) - rust-lang#88273 (Fix references to `ControlFlow` in docs) - rust-lang#88277 (Update books) - rust-lang#88291 (Add SAFETY comments to core::slice::sort::partition_in_blocks) - rust-lang#88293 (Fix grammar in alloc test) - rust-lang#88298 (Errorkind reorder) - rust-lang#88299 (Stabilise BufWriter::into_parts) - rust-lang#88314 (Add type of a let tait test) - rust-lang#88325 (Add mutable-noalias to the release notes for 1.54) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A few more SAFETY comments for #66219. There are still a few more in this module.
@rustbot label T-libs T-compiler C-cleanup