-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 14 pull requests #89529
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 14 pull requests #89529
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
On this platform, when doing stack allocation, MAP_STACK is needed otherwise the mapping fails.
Create VecDeque directly from the array instead of inserting items one-by-one.
Changes doc text to refer to the "default" parameter as the "default" function.
Co-authored-by: Ivan Tham <[email protected]>
Enable outline-atomics by default as enabled in clang by the following commit https://reviews.llvm.org/rGc5e7e649d537067dec7111f3de1430d0fc8a4d11 Performance improves by several orders of magnitude when using the LSE instructions instead of the ARMv8.0 compatible load/store exclusive instructions. Tested on Graviton2 aarch64-linux with x.py build && x.py install && x.py test
This change makes it consistent with `Hash` for all other collections.
A subset of places referred to 'super-trait', so this changes them to all use 'supertrait'. This matches 'supertype' and some other usages. An exception is 'auto-trait' which is consistently used in that manner.
…kingjubilee [aarch64] add target feature outline-atomics Enable outline-atomics by default as enabled in clang by the following commit https://reviews.llvm.org/rGc5e7e649d537067dec7111f3de1430d0fc8a4d11 Performance improves by several orders of magnitude when using the LSE instructions instead of the ARMv8.0 compatible load/store exclusive instructions. Tested on Graviton2 aarch64-linux with x.py build && x.py install && x.py test
…shtriplett implement advance_(back_)_by on more iterators Add more efficient, non-default implementations for `feature(iter_advance_by)` (rust-lang#77404) on more iterators and adapters. This PR only contains implementations where skipping over items doesn't elide any observable side-effects such as user-provided closures or `clone()` functions. I'll put those in a separate PR.
stack overflow handler specific openbsd change.
Fix an ICE caused by type mismatch errors being ignored This PR fixes rust-lang#87771. It turns out that the check on `compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/demand.rs:148` leads to the ICE. I removed it because the early return in [`check_expr_assign`](https://github.com/theo-lw/rust/blob/dec7fc3ced5bc3c18d0e5d29921d087f93189cb8/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs#L928) already prevents unnecessary error messages from the call to `check_expr_coercable_to_type`.
…u-se VecDeque: improve performance for From<[T; N]> Create `VecDeque` directly from the array instead of inserting items one-by-one. Benchmark ``` ./x.py bench library/alloc --test-args vec_deque::bench_from_array_1000 ``` * Before ``` test vec_deque::bench_from_array_1000 ... bench: 3,991 ns/iter (+/- 717) ``` * After ``` test vec_deque::bench_from_array_1000 ... bench: 268 ns/iter (+/- 37) ```
…x, r=dtolnay Improve wording of `map_or_else` docs Changes doc text to refer to the "default" parameter as the "default" function. Previously, the doc text referred to the "f" parameter as the "default" function; and the "default" parameter as the "fallback" function.
…avidtwco Recommend running `cargo clean` in E0514 output This suggestion has worked for me before. Seems to me it could help others.
Include the length in BTree hashes This change makes it consistent with `Hash` for all other collections.
…=jyn514 rustdoc: use slice::contains instead of open-coding it
Improve error message for missing angle brackets in `[_]::method` Fixes rust-lang#89388.
…t-usage, r=nagisa Consistently use 'supertrait'. A subset of places referred to 'super-trait', so this changes them to all use 'supertrait'. This matches 'supertype' and some other usages. An exception is 'auto-trait' which is consistently used in that manner.
…estebank Practice diagnostic message convention Detected by rust-lang#89455. r? ``@estebank``
…nkov Fix ICE with buffered lint referring to AST node deleted by everybody_loops Fixes rust-lang#87308. Note the following comment: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/08759c691e2e9799a3c6780ffdf910240ebd4a6b/compiler/rustc_lint/src/early.rs#L415-L417 As it turns out, this is not _always_ a bug, because `-Zunpretty=everybody_loops` causes a lot of AST nodes to be deleted, and thus some buffered lints will refer to non-existent node ids. To fix this, my changes simply ignore buffered lints if `-Zunpretty=everybody_loops` is enabled, which, from my understanding, shouldn't be a big issue because it only affects pretty-printing. Of course, a more elegant solution would only ignore buffered lints that actually point at deleted node ids, but I haven't figured out an easy way of achieving this. For the concrete example in rust-lang#87308, the buffered lint is created [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/08759c691e2e9799a3c6780ffdf910240ebd4a6b/compiler/rustc_expand/src/mbe/macro_rules.rs#L145-L151) with the `lint_node_id` from [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/08759c691e2e9799a3c6780ffdf910240ebd4a6b/compiler/rustc_expand/src/mbe/macro_rules.rs#L319), i.e. it points at the macro _expansion_, which then gets deleted by `ReplaceBodyWithLoop` [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/08759c691e2e9799a3c6780ffdf910240ebd4a6b/compiler/rustc_interface/src/passes.rs#L377).
…shtriplett Stabilize `const_panic` Closes rust-lang#51999 FCP completed in rust-lang#89006 ``@rustbot`` label +A-const-eval +A-const-fn +T-lang cc ``@oli-obk`` for review (not `r?`'ing as not on lang team)
@bors r+ p=5 |
📌 Commit 4984e50 has been approved by |
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 4. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened. |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Oct 4, 2021
⌛ Testing commit 4984e50 with merge 6ce9b4ef6e5289467b02c3e9e686e6fb6a41738d... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Oct 4, 2021
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Oct 4, 2021
Thanks Jubilee! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
map_or_else
docs #89400 (Improve wording ofmap_or_else
docs)cargo clean
in E0514 output #89407 (Recommend runningcargo clean
in E0514 output)[_]::method
#89447 (Improve error message for missing angle brackets in[_]::method
)const_panic
#89508 (Stabilizeconst_panic
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup