Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove in_band_lifetimes from rustc_mir_dataflow #91922

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2021

Conversation

LegionMammal978
Copy link
Contributor

See #91867 for more information.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Dec 14, 2021
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nagisa

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 14, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@LegionMammal978 LegionMammal978 force-pushed the less-inband-mir_dataflow branch from f18a742 to 9aba282 Compare December 14, 2021 17:34
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 15, 2021

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #91945) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@LegionMammal978 LegionMammal978 force-pushed the less-inband-mir_dataflow branch from 9aba282 to fed881a Compare December 16, 2021 19:41
@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Dec 17, 2021

@bors r+ rollup

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 17, 2021

📌 Commit fed881a has been approved by nagisa

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 17, 2021
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2021
…aflow, r=nagisa

Remove `in_band_lifetimes` from `rustc_mir_dataflow`

See rust-lang#91867 for more information.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2021
…askrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#91439 (Mark defaulted `PartialEq`/`PartialOrd` methods as const)
 - rust-lang#91516 (Improve suggestion to change struct field to &mut)
 - rust-lang#91896 (Remove `in_band_lifetimes` for `rustc_passes`)
 - rust-lang#91909 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)
 - rust-lang#91922 (Remove `in_band_lifetimes` from `rustc_mir_dataflow`)
 - rust-lang#92025 (Revert "socket ancillary data implementation for dragonflybsd.")
 - rust-lang#92030 (Update stdlib to the 2021 edition)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit d2f2f0b into rust-lang:master Dec 18, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.59.0 milestone Dec 18, 2021
@LegionMammal978 LegionMammal978 deleted the less-inband-mir_dataflow branch January 9, 2022 13:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants