Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add another implementation example to Debug trait #92322

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 5, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
23 changes: 21 additions & 2 deletions library/core/src/fmt/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -570,11 +570,30 @@ impl Display for Arguments<'_> {
/// There are a number of helper methods on the [`Formatter`] struct to help you with manual
/// implementations, such as [`debug_struct`].
///
/// [`debug_struct`]: Formatter::debug_struct
///
/// Types that do not wish to use the standard suite of debug representations
/// provided by the `Formatter` trait (`debug_struct`, `debug_tuple`,
/// `debut_list`, `debug_set`, `debug_map`) can do something totally custom by
/// manually writing an arbitrary representation to the `Formatter`.
///
/// ```
/// # use std::fmt;
/// # struct Point {
/// # x: i32,
/// # y: i32,
/// # }
/// #
/// impl fmt::Debug for Point {
/// fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
/// write!(f, "Point [{} {}]", self.x, self.y)
/// }
/// }
/// ```
///
/// `Debug` implementations using either `derive` or the debug builder API
/// on [`Formatter`] support pretty-printing using the alternate flag: `{:#?}`.
///
/// [`debug_struct`]: Formatter::debug_struct
///
/// Pretty-printing with `#?`:
///
/// ```
Expand Down