-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 7 pull requests #92934
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 7 pull requests #92934
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
And to remove possibility of panics while changing the panic handler, because that resulted in a double panic.
Useful for thin wrapper attributes that are best passed as value instead of reference.
includes minor refactorings
Implement `panic::update_hook` Add a new function `panic::update_hook` to allow creating panic hooks that forward the call to the previously set panic hook, without race conditions. It works by taking a closure that transforms the old panic hook into a new one, while ensuring that during the execution of the closure no other thread can modify the panic hook. This is a small function so I hope it can be discussed here without a formal RFC, however if you prefer I can write one. Consider the following example: ```rust let prev = panic::take_hook(); panic::set_hook(Box::new(move |info| { println!("panic handler A"); prev(info); })); ``` This is a common pattern in libraries that need to do something in case of panic: log panic to a file, record code coverage, send panic message to a monitoring service, print custom message with link to github to open a new issue, etc. However it is impossible to avoid race conditions with the current API, because two threads can execute in this order: * Thread A calls `panic::take_hook()` * Thread B calls `panic::take_hook()` * Thread A calls `panic::set_hook()` * Thread B calls `panic::set_hook()` And the result is that the original panic hook has been lost, as well as the panic hook set by thread A. The resulting panic hook will be the one set by thread B, which forwards to the default panic hook. This is not considered a big issue because the panic handler setup is usually run during initialization code, probably before spawning any other threads. Using the new `panic::update_hook` function, this race condition is impossible, and the result will be either `A, B, original` or `B, A, original`. ```rust panic::update_hook(|prev| { Box::new(move |info| { println!("panic handler A"); prev(info); }) }); ``` I found one real world use case here: https://github.com/dtolnay/proc-macro2/blob/988cf403e741aadfd5340bbf67e35e1062a526aa/src/detection.rs#L32 the workaround is to detect the race condition and panic in that case. The pattern of `take_hook` + `set_hook` is very common, you can see some examples in this pull request, so I think it's natural to have a function that combines them both. Also using `update_hook` instead of `take_hook` + `set_hook` reduces the number of calls to `HOOK_LOCK.write()` from 2 to 1, but I don't expect this to make any difference in performance. ### Unresolved questions: * `panic::update_hook` takes a closure, if that closure panics the error message is "panicked while processing panic" which is not nice. This is a consequence of holding the `HOOK_LOCK` while executing the closure. Could be avoided using `catch_unwind`? * Reimplement `panic::set_hook` as `panic::update_hook(|_prev| hook)`?
feat: rustc_pass_by_value lint attribute Useful for thin wrapper attributes that are best passed as value instead of reference. Fixes rust-lang#76935
…cs, r=camelid rustdoc: fix intra-link for generic trait impls fixes rust-lang#92662 r? ````@camelid````
…ron1011 Remove some unnecessary uses of `FieldDef::ident` Followup from rust-lang#92533. cc ````@Aaron1011```` ````@petrochenkov````
remove unused FIXME rust-lang#56935 seems to be fixed.
rustdoc: remove hand-rolled isatty This PR replaces bindings to the platform-specific isatty APIs with the `isatty` crate, as done elsewhere in the repository.
Move expr- and item-related pretty printing functions to modules Currently *compiler/rustc_ast_pretty/src/pprust/state.rs* is 2976 lines on master. The `tidy` limit is 3000, which is blocking rust-lang#92243. This PR adds a `mod expr;` and `mod item;` to move logic related to those AST nodes out of the single huge file.
rustbot
added
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Jan 15, 2022
@bors r+ rollup=never p=7 |
📌 Commit b289c7c has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Jan 15, 2022
⌛ Testing commit b289c7c with merge 7210d1cdb5fa7b645cb35ce6174c73dd5bca5acb... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Jan 15, 2022
Looks like a spurious failure, same as in #91288 (comment) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
panic::update_hook
#92598 (Implementpanic::update_hook
)FieldDef::ident
#92799 (Remove some unnecessary uses ofFieldDef::ident
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup