rustdoc: fix spacing of non-toggled impl blocks #93763
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS. |
rustbot
added
the
T-rustdoc
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
Please add a GUI test. :) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
jsha
force-pushed
the
re-space-empty-impls
branch
2 times, most recently
from
aa13ee3 to
7806454
Compare
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
Feb 9, 2022
|
Thanks! @bors: r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 7806454 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2022
…umeGomez rustdoc: fix spacing of non-toggled impl blocks We [recently removed the "up here" arrows on item-infos](rust-lang#92651), and adjusted vertical spacing so that even without the arrow, it would be visually clear which item the item-info belonged to. The new CSS styles for vertical spacing only applied to toggles, though. This missed non-toggled impl blocks - for instance, those without any methods, like https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/marker/trait.Send.html#implementors. The result was lists of implementors that were spaced too closely. This PR fixes the spacing by making it apply to non-toggled impl blocks as well. This also fixes an issue where item-infos were displayed too far below their items. That was a result of display: table on .item-info .stab. Changed that to display: inline-block. Demo: https://rustdoc.crud.net/jsha/re-space-empty-impls/std/marker/trait.Send.html Before: <img width=300 src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/220205/152954394-ec0b80e7-2573-4f06-9d7a-7b10b8ceac60.png"> After: <img width=300 src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/220205/152954228-abac1d30-a76d-4ab1-89ec-ef7549fe8c9c.png"> r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
|
Looks like this failed in a rollup #93834 (comment) |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
We recently removed the "up here" arrows on item-infos, and adjusted vertical spacing so that even without the arrow, it would be visually clear which item the item-info belonged to. The new CSS styles for vertical spacing only applied to toggles, though. This missed non-toggled impl blocks - for instance, those without any methods, like https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/marker/trait.Send.html#implementors. The result was lists of implementors that were spaced too closely. This PR fixes the spacing by making it apply to non-toggled impl blocks as well. This also fixes an issue where item-infos were displayed too far below their items. That was a result of display: table on .item-info .stab. Changed that to display: inline-block.
jsha
force-pushed
the
re-space-empty-impls
branch
from
7806454 to
0b22d41
Compare
|
That seems to be a bug in browser-ui-test. The rounding should be 340, not 339. Weird. I'll send a fix as soon as possible. |
|
I updated the test for the fractional number. Should be good for now. But to be safe... @bors r=GuillaumeGomez rollup=never |
|
📌 Commit 0b22d41 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (c26fbf8): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We recently removed the "up here" arrows on item-infos, and adjusted
vertical spacing so that even without the arrow, it would be visually
clear which item the item-info belonged to. The new CSS styles for
vertical spacing only applied to toggles, though. This missed
non-toggled impl blocks - for instance, those without any methods, like
https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/marker/trait.Send.html#implementors.
The result was lists of implementors that were spaced too closely. This
PR fixes the spacing by making it apply to non-toggled impl blocks as
well.
This also fixes an issue where item-infos were displayed too far below
their items. That was a result of display: table on .item-info .stab.
Changed that to display: inline-block.
Demo: https://rustdoc.crud.net/jsha/re-space-empty-impls/std/marker/trait.Send.html
Before:
After:
r? @GuillaumeGomez