remove unused field from infcx
#95523
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
T-compiler
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
lmao yea, good find. This used to be a hack for wf checking, but that just uses RevealAll nowadays @bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 97959bae1b6d819a7af92e2fc6937381b90d5998 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
@bors r=oli-obk rollup |
|
📌 Commit a5c68d7 has been approved by |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2022
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#91416 (Specialize infinite-type "insert some indirection" suggestion for Option) - rust-lang#95384 (Update target_has_atomic documentation for stabilization) - rust-lang#95517 (small rustc_borrowck cleanup) - rust-lang#95520 (Fix typos in core::ptr docs) - rust-lang#95523 (remove unused field from `infcx`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
r? @oli-obk did we stop needing that for opaque types?