Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #96528

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Apr 28, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 5 pull requests #96528

merged 19 commits into from
Apr 28, 2022

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

pvdrz and others added 19 commits April 25, 2022 22:54
…r=jackh726

Ensure that `'_` and GAT yields errors

Fixes rust-lang#95305

```@bors``` r? ```@jackh726```
…davidtwco

Migrate ambiguous plus diagnostic to the new derive macro

r? ````@davidtwco```` ````@jyn514````
…-lifetime-suggestion, r=jackh726

Recover suggestions to introduce named lifetime under NLL

Fixes rust-lang#96157

r? ```@jackh726```

Built on top of rust-lang#96385 so only the second commit is relevant
rustc_ast: Harmonize delimiter naming with `proc_macro::Delimiter`

Compiler cannot reuse `proc_macro::Delimiter` directly due to extra impls, but can at least use the same naming.

After this PR the only difference between these two enums is that `proc_macro::Delimiter::None` is turned into `token::Delimiter::Invisible`.
It's my mistake that the invisible delimiter is called `None` on stable, during the stabilization I audited the naming and wrote the docs, but missed the fact that the `None` naming gives a wrong and confusing impression about what this thing is.

cc rust-lang#96421
r? ``@nnethercote``
Fixed grammatical error in example comment

Added missing "we" in sentence.
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Apr 28, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2022

📌 Commit 2c1d58b has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Apr 28, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 2c1d58b with merge e85edd9...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing e85edd9 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 28, 2022
@bors bors merged commit e85edd9 into rust-lang:master Apr 28, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (e85edd9): comparison url.

Summary:

  • Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
  • Secondary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
Regressions 😿
(primary)
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
All 😿 🎉
(primary)
count1 0 0 1 0 1
mean2 N/A N/A -0.4% N/A -0.4%
max N/A N/A -0.4% N/A -0.4%

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. number of relevant changes

  2. the arithmetic mean of the percent change

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants