-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Finish bumping stage0 #97214
Finish bumping stage0 #97214
Conversation
Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams! If this PR contains changes to any Examples of
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
481cb35
to
800ecb8
Compare
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 800ecb890ecfbf5075119db76e4f40c3a4dfdebf has been approved by |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #97239) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#97043 (Move some tests to more reasonable directories) - rust-lang#97206 (Do leak check after function pointer coercion) - rust-lang#97275 (small change) - rust-lang#97277 (Avoid accidentally enabling unstable features in compilers (take 2)) - rust-lang#97280 (Quote replace target in bootstrap configure) Failed merges: - rust-lang#97214 (Finish bumping stage0) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message
|
It looks like the last time had left some remaining cfg's -- which made me think that the stage0 bump was actually successful. This brings us to a released 1.62 beta though.
800ecb8
to
b454991
Compare
@bors r=pietroalbini |
📌 Commit b454991 has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit b454991 with merge f9ca16b18c56e7e2a4996843a84c29dcdb3d53c1... |
💥 Test timed out |
@bors retry
|
⌛ Testing commit b454991 with merge f22d59ab56de7c533c13e094c8e5786cbfe179d0... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
@bors retry armhf-gnu remote client connection reset |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (bef2b7c): comparison url. Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results
CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression Footnotes |
Filed #97669 to track the armhf-gnu spurious error. |
…=Mark-Simulacrum Use new cargo argument in bootstrap for cfg checking This PR use new cargo argument in bootstrap for doing cfg checking. Follow-up to rust-lang#97044 and rust-lang#97214. r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
It looks like the last time had left some remaining cfg's -- which made me think
that the stage0 bump was actually successful. This brings us to a released 1.62
beta though.
This now brings us to cfg-clean, with the exception of check-cfg-features in bootstrap;
I'd prefer to leave that for a separate PR at this time since it's likely to be more tricky.
cc #97147 (comment)
r? @pietroalbini