Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 4 pull requests #99054

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Jul 8, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 4 pull requests #99054

merged 17 commits into from
Jul 8, 2022

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

jyn514 and others added 17 commits June 26, 2022 06:27
This is useful for debugging drop-tracking; previously, you had to recompile
rustc from source and manually add a call to `write_graph_to_file`. This
makes the option more discoverable and configurable at runtime.

I also took the liberty of making the labels for the CFG nodes much easier to read:
previously, they looked like `id(2), local_id: 48`, now they look like
```
expr from_config (hir_id=HirId { owner: DefId(0:10 ~ default_struct_update[79f9]::foo), local_id: 2})
```
Because the `infcx` isn't needed. This removes one lifetime from
`Search`.
Currently, `search_for_structural_match_violation` constructs an `infcx`
from a `tcx` and then only uses the `tcx` within the `infcx`. This is
wasteful because `infcx` is a big type.

This commit changes it to use the `tcx` directly. When compiling
`pest-2.1.3`, this changes the memcpy stats reported by DHAT for a `check full`
build from this:
```
433,008,916 bytes (100%, 99,787.93/Minstr) in 2,148,668 blocks (100%, 495.17/Minstr), avg size 201.52 bytes
```
to this:
```
101,422,347 bytes (99.98%, 25,243.59/Minstr) in 1,318,407 blocks (99.96%, 328.15/Minstr), avg size 76.93 bytes
```
This translates to a 4.3% reduction in instruction counts.
Some of these are a little questionable because the output is so much longer, but I would really love to keep the bit that adds the pretty-printed expression to the generated CFG .dot file.

Before:
```
DEBUG rustc_typeck::check::generator_interior::drop_ranges::record_consumed_borrow consume PlaceWithHirId { hir_id: HirId { owner: DefId(0:7 ~ default_struct_update[79f9]::foo), local_id: 15 }, place: Place { base_ty: impl std::future::Future<Output = ()>, base: Rvalue, projections: [] } }; diag_expr_id=HirId { owner: DefId(0:7 ~ default_struct_update[79f9]::foo), local_id: 15 }, using parent expr HirId { owner: DefId(0:7 ~ default_struct_update[79f9]::foo), local_id: 49 }
```

After:
```
DEBUG rustc_typeck::check::generator_interior::drop_ranges::record_consumed_borrow consume PlaceWithHirId { hir_id: HirId { owner: DefId(0:7 ~ default_struct_update[79f9]::foo), local_id: 15 }, place: Place { base_ty: impl std::future::Future<Output = ()>, base: Rvalue, projections: [] } }; diag_expr_id=expr from_config(Config {
        nickname: None,
        ..Default::default()
    }) (hir_id=HirId { owner: DefId(0:7 ~ default_struct_update[79f9]::foo), local_id: 15 }), using parent expr
    .await (hir_id=HirId { owner: DefId(0:7 ~ default_struct_update[79f9]::foo), local_id: 49 })
```
…holk

Add a `-Zdump-drop-tracking-cfg` debugging flag

This is useful for debugging drop-tracking; previously, you had to recompile
rustc from source and manually add a call to `write_graph_to_file`. This
makes the option more discoverable and configurable at runtime.

I also took the liberty of making the labels for the CFG nodes much easier to read:
previously, they looked like `id(2), local_id: 48`, now they look like
```
expr from_config (hir_id=HirId { owner: DefId(0:10 ~ default_struct_update[79f9]::foo), local_id: 2})
```

r? ``@eholk``
An optimization for `pest-2.1.3`

An easy win I found while looking at a profile of `pest-2.1.3`. It's also a small code cleanup.

r? `@pnkfelix`
…ssion-diagnostic-1, r=davidtwco

Migrate some diagnostics from `rustc_const_eval` to `SessionDiagnostic`

I'm still trying to get the hang of this, so it doesn't migrate _all_ of `rustc_const_eval`. Working on that later.

r? `@davidtwco`
…nv, r=michaelwoerister

Highlight conflicting param-env candidates

This could probably be further improved by noting _why_ equivalent param-env candidates (modulo regions) leads to ambiguity.

Fixes rust-lang#98786
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jul 8, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 8, 2022

📌 Commit 54dde86 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jul 8, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 8, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 54dde86 with merge 45263fc...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 8, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing 45263fc to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 8, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 45263fc into rust-lang:master Jul 8, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.64.0 milestone Jul 8, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (45263fc): comparison url.

Instruction count

  • Primary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found
  • Secondary benchmarks: mixed results
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
0.3% 0.4% 2
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
1.3% 1.6% 6
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
-1.3% -2.3% 12
All 😿🎉 (primary) 0.3% 0.4% 2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
-1.0% -1.0% 1
All 😿🎉 (primary) N/A N/A 0

Cycles

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: mixed results
  • Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvements found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
2.1% 2.1% 2
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
-2.2% -2.2% 1
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
-2.7% -2.7% 2
All 😿🎉 (primary) 0.6% -2.2% 3

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2 3

  2. number of relevant changes 2 3

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Jul 8, 2022
@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC deleted the rollup-0zuhhds branch July 9, 2022 05:38
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum removed the perf-regression Performance regression. label Jul 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants