-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
wishlist: Allow optimization of uninhabited values #27
Comments
chrysn
added a commit
to chrysn-pull-requests/uX
that referenced
this issue
May 12, 2020
Contributes-To: rust-ux#27
The most tracking-issue-like place for that Rust feature right now is probably rust-lang/rust#94970 (which is asking for stabilization of a bunch of things, including |
I think you meant #49. Thanks, looking at it. |
Oops, yes. Pasting is hard. :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The uX types could, conceptually, allow the compiler to do optimizations based on their constraints -- for example, an Option could fit in a u64, and (later when mechanisms to make use of Copy are in place to ensure there won't be pointer to the interior; possibly coming out of rust-lang/rust#27060) a Result<u63, u63> could be too.
This can not be done in stable Rust now, and even the means to do it that are available in unstable (
rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_end
) are internal attributes never meant to become stable.This is not an issue that would be solved quickly (unless by a possible added unstable
range_optimizations
feature that could break on any nightly), but more a long-term point for visibility, and to document towards the language team the usefulness of a public way to achieve this.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: