Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement ByteValued for i128/u128 #238

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

roypat
Copy link
Collaborator

@roypat roypat commented Jun 14, 2023

Summary of the PR

Implements ByteValued for u128/i128, as well as arrays of them.

I also looked at turning the array implementations into one using const generics (to remove the restriction on them being only implemented for array sizes up to 32), but a combination of Default being a super trait of ByteValued and rust-lang/rust#61415 make this impossible

Requirements

Before submitting your PR, please make sure you addressed the following
requirements:

  • All commits in this PR are signed (with git commit -s), and the commit
    message has max 60 characters for the summary and max 75 characters for each
    description line.
  • All added/changed functionality has a corresponding unit/integration
    test.
  • All added/changed public-facing functionality has entries in the "Upcoming
    Release" section of CHANGELOG.md (if no such section exists, please create one).
  • Any newly added unsafe code is properly documented.

@roypat roypat force-pushed the byte-valued-128 branch 2 times, most recently from 674baa4 to e39f487 Compare June 15, 2023 08:20
roypat added 2 commits June 27, 2023 13:52
The only interesting thing in this commit is adjusting the unit test
that tests these implementations, as u128/i128 can be aligned to 8 byte
boundaries on x86. So only check that reading fails for values
misaligned by 1 through 7 bytes.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Roy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Roy <[email protected]>
@vireshk
Copy link
Contributor

vireshk commented Jun 28, 2023

superseded by #242

@jiangliu jiangliu closed this Jun 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants