-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Retain glyph names when merging #41
Comments
I think I have found a solution to this 😄, I will include this with the next release if it tests out well. Thanks for reporting this 👍 somewhat related (in that info is lost): #43 |
Ok, thanks a lot! Will be looking forward to it. P.S. |
Yes you are correct Octicons I am using is not up to date, see: #34 (comment) No worries I was actually late to the GitHub party as well 😄 . For this issue we can leave it open and I will close it on the next release. |
This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity (i.e. last half year) after it was closed. It helps our maintainers focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar, please open a new issue, complete the issue template with all the details necessary to reproduce, and mention this issue as reference. |
I've noticed that glyph names are lost when patching fonts. For example, if I take the Octicons font as a source of glyphs and patch another font with it (with the
--octicons
option), then all the glyph names (e.g. octoface or mark-github or repo-forked for some of the standard GitHub glyphs) are lost and instead replaced by Unicode glyph codes (e.g. uniF008 for octoface).Is there a chance to retain those names? They are very useful in finding specific glyph codes (remembering a name is much easier than remembering a code, especially since codes can change between font versions, while name is usually more stable).
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: