Implement semantic-release for this formula
#203
Assignees
Labels
Comments
myii
added a commit
to myii/users-formula
that referenced
this issue
Aug 4, 2019
* Based on `ssf-formula` (v0.3.0) - myii/ssf-formula#5 * Unable to use `pillar.example` directly for testing - Used it as a basis for `test/salt/pillar/default.sls` - Brought useful changes back to `pillar.example` * Fix: avoid `users/googleauth.sls` for `RedHat` & `Suse` * Close saltstack-formulas#203
myii
added a commit
to myii/users-formula
that referenced
this issue
Aug 7, 2019
* Based on `ssf-formula` (v0.3.0) - myii/ssf-formula#5 * Unable to use `pillar.example` directly for testing - Used it as a basis for `test/salt/pillar/default.sls` - Brought useful changes back to `pillar.example` * Fix: avoid `users/googleauth.sls` for `RedHat` & `Suse` * Close saltstack-formulas#203
saltstack-formulas-travis
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 7, 2019
# [0.47.0](v0.46.1...v0.47.0) (2019-08-07) ### Features * **semantic-release:** implement for this formula ([3bcdc90](3bcdc90)), closes [#203](#203)
|
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 0.47.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The main purpose of starting this issue is to actually prevent anyone else from spending time on this, since I've virtually completed this. I'll be submitting a PR fairly soon, depending on some decisions that are being made in the
template-formulaover the coming days.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: