Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support secondary indexes on DynamoDB #147

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2021
Merged

Conversation

yito88
Copy link
Member

@yito88 yito88 commented Jan 22, 2021

https://scalar-labs.atlassian.net/browse/DLT-7881

@yito88 yito88 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 22, 2021
@yito88 yito88 self-assigned this Jan 22, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@feeblefakie feeblefakie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link
Collaborator

@brfrn169 brfrn169 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@@ -154,6 +156,50 @@ public void get_GetWithProjectionsGiven_ShouldRetrieveSpecifiedValues()
assertThat(actual.get().getValue(COL_NAME5).isPresent()).isFalse();
}

@Test
public void get_GetGivenForIndexedColumn_ShouldGet() throws ExecutionException {
Copy link
Collaborator

@brfrn169 brfrn169 Jan 22, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just a comment. We have the same integration test code for each storage implementation. I'm wondering if we can unify the same integration test code for all storage implementations.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@brfrn169 Let's do it! I'll create a story for that.

@feeblefakie feeblefakie merged commit a68aa4c into master Jan 22, 2021
@feeblefakie feeblefakie deleted the secondary_index_dynamo branch January 22, 2021 08:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants