Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inline support for properties #75

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2012
Merged

Conversation

mvrhov
Copy link
Contributor

@mvrhov mvrhov commented Feb 3, 2012

My use case for having property marked as inline is that I can hide implementation detail from service consumer.

@schmittjoh
Copy link
Owner

Can you give some use cases?

I'm wondering how often this occurs, and if we not better move that into a custom handler.

@mvrhov
Copy link
Contributor Author

mvrhov commented Feb 5, 2012

In my application I have two use cases. The one is one to one relation between account and profile. The other one is about data dedup that's happening behind the scenes. There is a lot of common metadata which is stored in another table (one to many relation), but the api consumer really shouldn't know about this.

…lized to the same level as the property is.
@mvrhov
Copy link
Contributor Author

mvrhov commented Feb 16, 2012

rebased

@schmittjoh schmittjoh merged commit b8f6c64 into schmittjoh:master Feb 21, 2012
@schmittjoh
Copy link
Owner

sorry for the wait, merged it now

chasewoo pushed a commit to royuan/JMSSerializerBundle that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2013
Remove useless YamlSerializationVisitor::prepare method
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants