-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 690
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
?_shape=array option #245
Comments
simonw
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 2, 2018
* Default is now ?_shape=arrays (renamed from lists) * New ?_shape=array returns an array of objects as the root object * Changed ?_shape=object to return the object as the root * Updated docs
simonw
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 2, 2018
* Default is now ?_shape=arrays (renamed from lists) * New ?_shape=array returns an array of objects as the root object * Changed ?_shape=object to return the object as the root * Updated docs
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Some tools (
pandas.DataFrame(...)
for example) are happiest when you give them a raw array of JSON objects.?_shape=array
should do just thatWhile I'm at it, rename the default
?_shape=lists
to instead be called?shape=arrays
And validate that
_shape
is a valid optionAnd have
?_shape=object
return the object at the root level rather than nested in.rows
to better match the behavior of?_shape=array
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: