Remove SparseVarArray

[hellemo]

No description provided.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Base: 83.95% // Head: 84.98% // Increases project coverage by +1.03% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (c4040b7) compared to base (1072681).
Patch coverage: 88.88% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #31      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.95%   84.98%   +1.03%     
==========================================
  Files           6        4       -2     
  Lines         405      293     -112     
==========================================
- Hits          340      249      -91     
+ Misses         65       44      -21     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/dictionaries.jl	85.48% <0.00%> (-2.55%)	⬇️
src/indexedarray.jl	90.19% <100.00%> (-0.96%)	⬇️
src/sparsearray.jl	81.25% <100.00%> (+27.08%)	⬆️
src/tables.jl	63.15% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[trulsf]

Nice cleanup! Consider adding a version of the Tables support without waiting for JuMP support, or will this be considered a breaking change if we move rowtable from SparseVariables to JuMP.Containers at a later stage?

[hellemo]

Nice cleanup! Consider adding a version of the Tables support without waiting for JuMP support, or will this be considered a breaking change if we move rowtable from SparseVariables to JuMP.Containers at a later stage?

I guess I replied to the wrong comment just now. Yes, I think we can do this as long as we don't export rowtable and make it clear we don't support it until it's added in an new JuMP release.