Account for hard-deleted models, suppliers in asset history

[snipe]

This catches the scenario where an asset had been previously classified with a model ID or supplier ID that was subsequently hard-deleted.

I think this transformer still needs to be refactored though. I'm seeing the n+1 query problem I mentioned a few weeks ago.

[what-the-diff]

PR Summary

• Improved Error Handling For Deleted Models
  Instead of showing an error when a model has been deleted, the system now displays the name of the removed model. This feature enhances user experience by providing smoother navigation through the systems.

• Enhanced Interaction with Removed Suppliers
  The system is now able to show the name of a deleted supplier instead of an error message. The added functionality will allow users to understand their past interactions better.

• Internationalization Support for Asset Models
  A translation string for the phrase "Deleted asset model" has been added to the English language file. This inclusion supports our continued efforts towards improving accessibility and inclusivity for all users.

• Translation Support for Suppliers
  A new translation string for "Deleted supplier" has been included in the English language file. This addition helps to accommodate users of different linguistic backgrounds for greater accessibility.

[uberbrady]

This makes sense to me. I'm not sure I agree with you on the N+1 query problem needing to be solved here, but I can be convinced. But in the meantime, this seems like a somewhat safer way to go, moving forward.

[snipe]

@uberbrady That endpoint is showing 53 queries - with an asset with a lot of history, that could get messy.

[snipe]

Merging this for now, just to fix the 500, but we should probably revisit the solution here.

Additionally, I kinda don't think we should be hot-querying that stuff anyway. I kind of wanted it to be "At this moment in time of the change, the asset model was called 'Blah'"