You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Spectacles users would benefit from an additional validator that runs Looker's Content Validation via the API. There are a number of open questions about how this should work. This validator could expose the output in two possible ways:
All content that requires validating on that branch. This would be a simple call to the content validation endpoint.
All content that requires validating on that branch that doesn't require validating on the master branch, i.e. things that this branch actually broke. This would require two calls and comparison of content between the two.
My gut feel is that we probably want to provide both ways, possibly controlled by a flag.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What should people be able to select or exclude? Folders? Spaces? Anything in a private space?
How should the content be grouped? In Looker you can change this to group on error, folder, or content. Should we provide an option in the CLI to do the same or is this superfluous?
Spectacles users would benefit from an additional validator that runs Looker's Content Validation via the API. There are a number of open questions about how this should work. This validator could expose the output in two possible ways:
My gut feel is that we probably want to provide both ways, possibly controlled by a flag.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: