Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Refine scheme, userinfo, host and port parsing in UriComponentsBuilder #32617

Closed
github-actions bot opened this issue Apr 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Refine scheme, userinfo, host and port parsing in UriComponentsBuilder #32617

github-actions bot opened this issue Apr 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@bclozel
Labels
in: web Issues in web modules (web, webmvc, webflux, websocket) type: backport An issue that is a backport of another issue to a maintenance branch type: bug A general bug
Milestone
6.0.19

Comments

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Backport of gh-32616
@github-actions github-actions bot added in: web Issues in web modules (web, webmvc, webflux, websocket) type: backport An issue that is a backport of another issue to a maintenance branch type: bug A general bug labels Apr 11, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 6.0.19 milestone Apr 11, 2024
bclozel added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2024
@bclozel
Refine UriComponentsBuilder parsing
402246d 
This commit refines the expressions for the scheme, user info, host and
port parts of the URL in UriComponentsBuilder to better conform to
RFC 3986.

Fixes gh-32617
@bclozel bclozel self-assigned this Apr 11, 2024
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed via 402246d

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@bclozel bclozel

Labels
in: web Issues in web modules (web, webmvc, webflux, websocket) type: backport An issue that is a backport of another issue to a maintenance branch type: bug A general bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
6.0.19
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@bclozel