-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Case study: Estimating Dynamic Cross-National Opinion Using Existing Survey Data #195
Conversation
fixes error in country labels
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good except for the one issue with the url (see review comment)
fixed url
: latent variable models, public opinion, longitudinal model | ||
|
||
Source Repository | ||
: [example-models/knitr/dynamic-opinion](https://github.com/joonho112/example-models/tree/master/knitr/dynamic_opinion/estimating-dynamic-latent-opinion.html) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm still getting an error even with this new link. It doesn't look like there's a dynamic-opinion folder inside joonho112/example-models/tree/master/knitr/
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've changed the url to my repo - maybe the path of least resistance?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for the delay on this. The current URL I see is
but this still gives me a 404 - page not found error. Is the URL right? Or is this a private repository maybe?
Hi Jonah,
Sorry, I don't think I did the pull request properly. I've tried again -
hopefully its now available to you
best,
Chris
…On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 16:51, Jonah Gabry ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In users/documentation/case-studies.md
<#195 (comment)>
:
> @@ -31,6 +31,28 @@ for code, Creative Commons for text)</span>; authors retain all copyright.
<hr style="margin:0.25em 0 0.25em 0;"/>
<hr style="margin:0 0 2em 0;"/>
+## Estimating Dynamic Cross-National Opinion Using Existing Survey Data
+<small> This case study describes a method for estimating dynamic, cross-national, latent public opinion using existing survey data. It outlines the model and its coding in Stan, explains how to set the model up in R and run it using cmdstanr, then walks through an example where the model is used to estimate public support for democracy in 144 countries from 1988 to 2020.
+
+[View](case-studies/estimating-dynamic-latent-opinion.html) <span
+class="note">(HTML)</span>
+
+Authors
+: Christopher Claassen
+
+Keywords
+: latent variable models, public opinion, longitudinal model
+
+Source Repository
+: [example-models/knitr/dynamic-opinion](https://github.com/joonho112/example-models/tree/master/knitr/dynamic_opinion/estimating-dynamic-latent-opinion.html)
I'm still getting an error even with this new link. It doesn't look like
there's a dynamic-opinion folder inside
joonho112/example-models/tree/master/knitr/.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#195 (review)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACGEZQN3FM5W6UARU63JLPTYFYUPLAVCNFSM6AAAAAA7VBOFYCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMYTONBUHEYTSNBVGI>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
I've tried once more to push the files to your master repo. Probably did something wrong first time, sorry! |
You won't have the necessary permissions to push to our repo. Plus, we don't want anyone pushing to Plus, could you please add a description, even a one liner. Is this a new case study or an update to an existing one? |
Closing (with author's permission) in favor of #196 |
No description provided.