-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 252
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding Melos for monorepo management #681
Conversation
# Override to local mono-repo path so devs can test this repo | ||
# against changes that they're making to other mono-repo packages | ||
attributed_text: | ||
path: ../../attributed_text |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a reason that this one dependency is left under overrides, but all the others are listed above as regular deps?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This dependency is transitive, the others are direct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, can you adjust the comment to make that clear? The other dependencies are also "to local mono-repo path" so it's not obvious why this one is different. But if you explain that it's transitive then the reader should understand.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done, let me know if you want me to revise the new comments to be more verbose
My plan is to get this PR and the AttributedText PR merged after the next couple releases, because we're almost done with a couple deliverables. BTW, it looks like Windows tests are failing in CI |
Cool, I'll keep the branches up to date with
Well this is annoying. Turns out there was a bug introduced in Dart |
78be9ed
to
460817f
Compare
@matthew-carroll This is ready for another look if you're still interested in this change. #680 describes the reasoning and proposes an alternative if you don't want to add a dependency on an external tool. |
Yeah, I'd like to get this in, but can we start with the attribution range change? |
I'm going to close this because it's so out of date. We still want this. I'll probably refactor for Melos before the next major release. That will be a different PR. |
See #680 for details. Let me know if the update to the root readme should be moved or copied to any of the individual project readmes. I was on the fence about doing so but it seems potentially annoying to maintain setup instructions in each individual package as the repo grows. Maybe just add a line to each one saying to refer to the root readme to set up your development environment?
Closes #680.