Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bug in rootfind for enthalpy parametrization #4536

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2022

Conversation

isaaclegred
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes

Change the limits for rootfind in computing density as a function of specific enthalpy

Upgrade instructions

Code review checklist

  • The code is documented and the documentation renders correctly. Run
    make doc to generate the documentation locally into BUILD_DIR/docs/html.
    Then open index.html.
  • The code follows the stylistic and code quality guidelines listed in the
    code review guide.
  • The PR lists upgrade instructions and is labeled bugfix or
    new feature if appropriate.

Further comments

@isaaclegred isaaclegred added the small Only changes a few lines of code, does a rename or is otherwise quick to review label Dec 20, 2022
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
#include "PointwiseFunctions/Hydro/EquationsOfState/Factory.hpp"
#include "PointwiseFunctions/Hydro/SpecificEnthalpy.hpp"
#include "Utilities/ErrorHandling/Error.hpp"
#include "Utilities/MakeWithValue.hpp"
#include "Utilities/MakeWithValue.hpp
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

missing quotation

nilsvu
nilsvu previously requested changes Dec 20, 2022
Comment on lines +163 to +164
// Guarantee that the root find has the correct bracket by explicitly
// nonsensical there, so if the correct braket
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix this sentence

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need this merged ASAP because we are doing large simulations on Wheeler over the break. I think the sentence, while not great, is clear enough that it would be better for our science purposes to not delay this PR. Given some folks (including myself) are already on vacation and only doing this that are needed to do simulations over the break, I'd like to not block this PR on the sentence...

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure, please fix later then

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, Thanks!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just FYI, as a reminder: #4537

@nilsvu nilsvu dismissed their stale review December 20, 2022 19:35

deferred

@nilsdeppe nilsdeppe mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2022
@nilsdeppe nilsdeppe merged commit 03d3915 into sxs-collaboration:develop Dec 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bugfix small Only changes a few lines of code, does a rename or is otherwise quick to review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants