Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial: quick fixes #1778

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2019
Merged

Editorial: quick fixes #1778

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2019

Conversation

jmdyck
Copy link
Collaborator

@jmdyck jmdyck commented Nov 14, 2019

A couple quick fixes for one of today's merges.

@ljharb ljharb requested review from syg, bakkot and a team November 14, 2019 06:04
…als" (tc39#1778)

 - "Set X to be Y" -> "Set X to Y"
 - The change from backticks to asterisks occurred a few weeks ago via PR tc39#1733. Looks like the merge of PR tc39#1479 accidentally reverted it for this one line.
@ljharb ljharb merged commit c808fe2 into tc39:master Nov 14, 2019
@bakkot
Copy link
Contributor

bakkot commented Nov 14, 2019

We've got to start writing down style conventions at some point.

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Nov 14, 2019

I'm still hoping we can find some kind of linter :-)

@bakkot
Copy link
Contributor

bakkot commented Nov 14, 2019

I'm a fan of linters, but we'd need to start by writing down the current style conventions even if we had one.

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Nov 14, 2019

True enough - https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-notational-conventions is begging to be fleshed out.

@jmdyck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jmdyck commented Nov 14, 2019

Note that writing down style conventions wouldn't have prevented the problems addressed by this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants