Editorial: replace a few stray GetReferencedName invocations / re-define "super-reference" #2220
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bakkot
changed the title
ljharb
approved these changes
Nov 2, 2020
michaelficarra
approved these changes
Nov 3, 2020
syg
approved these changes
Nov 3, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
GetReferencedNamewas removed by #2085, but while that PR was open #2030 landed and introduced three new references to it, which we missed. This PR fixes those three references.Also, #2085 removed the id for "super-reference"; this restores that as an
oldidon the definition of "Super Reference Record".Thanks to @jmdyck for pointing these out.