Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"dotted" versus "numeric" #16

Closed
sffc opened this issue May 29, 2020 · 12 comments · Fixed by #60
Closed

"dotted" versus "numeric" #16

sffc opened this issue May 29, 2020 · 12 comments · Fixed by #60
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@sffc
Copy link
Collaborator

sffc commented May 29, 2020

ICU allows four widths: long, short, narrow, and numeric.

The current README for Intl.DurationFormat has these four: long, short, narrow, and dotted.

What is the difference between numeric and dotted? Let's discuss which name is better.

@ryzokuken
Copy link
Member

I think "numeric" sounds better, personally.

@younies younies added the Meeting Discussion Need to be discussed in one of the upcoming meetings label Jun 15, 2020
@younies
Copy link
Member

younies commented Jun 15, 2020

I totally agree with @ryzokuken

@younies
Copy link
Member

younies commented Aug 24, 2020

I was thinking about something means very small such as nano or micro. Also, @ryzokuken suggested to use tiny to not conflict with nanoseconds and microseconds

@sffc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sffc commented Sep 10, 2020

The finalist options are:

  1. delimited
  2. digital
  3. clock
  4. concise
  5. symbolic

@sffc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sffc commented Sep 10, 2020

@ptomato
Copy link
Contributor

ptomato commented Sep 10, 2020

+1 for "concise" or "symbolic"

@sffc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sffc commented Sep 11, 2020

I don't like "concise" for two reasons:

  1. It sounds too much like "compact" in the sense of compact notation
  2. It is too general, and I would rather reserve that word for other potential uses

In this context, I would rather use a more specific term. Any of the other four choices are specific enough.

@younies
Copy link
Member

younies commented Jan 14, 2021

+1 for digital

@Louis-Aime
Copy link

+1 3:clock

@justingrant
Copy link

+1 digital

1 similar comment
@FrankYFTang
Copy link
Collaborator

FrankYFTang commented Jan 14, 2021

+1 digital

@sffc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sffc commented Jan 14, 2021

2021-01-04: agreed on "digital".

@younies younies closed this as completed Feb 2, 2021
@younies younies reopened this Feb 2, 2021
@younies younies added spec and removed Meeting Discussion Need to be discussed in one of the upcoming meetings labels Feb 2, 2021
@younies younies self-assigned this Mar 19, 2021
@ryzokuken ryzokuken added this to the Stage 3 milestone Apr 5, 2021
@ryzokuken ryzokuken removed the spec label Apr 5, 2021
ryzokuken added a commit to ryzokuken/proposal-intl-duration-format that referenced this issue Apr 7, 2021
ryzokuken added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 8, 2021
* spec,doc: rename dotted to digital

Fixes: #16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

7 participants