Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 9, 2024. It is now read-only.

Path to Stage 4! #15

Closed
31 tasks done
ljharb opened this issue Feb 7, 2024 · 14 comments
Closed
31 tasks done

Path to Stage 4! #15

ljharb opened this issue Feb 7, 2024 · 14 comments
Assignees
@ljharb

Comments

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Feb 7, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Stage 4

  • committee approval
  • two implementations
    • WebKit, behind a flag and with arg forwarding (PR) - no longer behind a flag (PR)
    • Keisel
    • Boa
    • LibJS
    • Chrome / v8 (v128)
    • Firefox / spidermonkey issue issue 2 (behind a flag in v132 nightly, targeted for 133 or 134 unflagged)
    • Bun (tweet)
    • CloudFlare Workers (tweet
  • significant in-the-field experience
  • ecma262 PR approved
  • prepare ecma262 PR (PR)

Stage 3

  • merge test262 tests
  • write test262 tests (PR)
  • receive implementer feedback

Stage 2.7

Stage 2

  • incorporate enumeration (✨ stage 2 #17)
  • committee approval
  • spec text written

Stage 1

  • committee approval
@ljharb ljharb self-assigned this Feb 7, 2024
@ljharb ljharb mentioned this issue Feb 7, 2024
Closed
@rkirsling
Copy link
Member

LGTM overall; my one comment would be that maybe we should include the NOTE attached to Promise.resolve here too.

ljharb added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2024
@ljharb
[spec] add note about receiver convention
fdb9bd2 
See #15 (comment)
@ljharb
Copy link
Member Author

ljharb commented Feb 8, 2024

Thanks, done in fdb9bd2

@rkirsling
Copy link
Member

Went ahead and implemented it in JSC right away: WebKit/WebKit@6d51d57

@damian-snyk damian-snyk mentioned this issue Apr 5, 2024
Open
@syg
Copy link

syg commented Apr 8, 2024

Editorially, spec draft lgtm.

Normatively, I'd like #16 merged (which also lgtm).

@bakkot
Copy link

bakkot commented Apr 8, 2024

LGTM with #16.

@michaelficarra
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@linusg
Copy link
Member

linusg commented Apr 8, 2024

Implemented in Kiesel: https://codeberg.org/kiesel-js/kiesel/commit/5e215d3dc8839768960343f4ca7e2764c188828a

@linusg
Copy link
Member

linusg commented Apr 9, 2024

This was so simple that I decided to implement it in two more engines :)

@gibson042
Copy link

gibson042 commented Apr 9, 2024 •
edited
Loading

I have reservations about Promise.try accepting variadic arguments that leave no room for ever specifying a receiver—setting it apart from Function.prototype.{apply,call} and Reflect.apply. However, they do not rise to the level of a blocking concern. Consider this a signoff from me.

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member

I have reservations about Promise.try accepting variadic arguments that leave no room for ever specifying a receiver—setting it apart from Function.prototype.{apply,call} and Reflect.apply.

AsyncContext is also doing this for our run methods, so this won't be the only one.

Vylpes pushed a commit to Vylpes/Droplet that referenced this issue Apr 10, 2024
@Vylpes
Update dependency core-js to v3.36.1 (#294)
67b20fa 
This PR contains the following updates:

| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [core-js](https://github.com/zloirock/core-js) | dependencies | minor | [`3.35.1` -> `3.36.1`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/core-js/3.35.1/3.36.1) |

---

### Release Notes

<details>
<summary>zloirock/core-js (core-js)</summary>

### [`v3.36.1`](https://github.com/zloirock/core-js/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#3361---20240319)

[Compare Source](zloirock/core-js@v3.36.0...v3.36.1)

-   Changes [v3.36.0...v3.36.1](zloirock/core-js@v3.36.0...v3.36.1)
-   Fixed some validation cases in `Object.setPrototypeOf`, [#&#8203;1329](zloirock/core-js#1329), thanks [**@&#8203;minseok-choe**](https://github.com/minseok-choe)
-   Fixed the order of validations in `Array.from`, [#&#8203;1331](zloirock/core-js#1331), thanks [**@&#8203;minseok-choe**](https://github.com/minseok-choe)
-   Added a fix of [Bun `queueMicrotask` arity](oven-sh/bun#9249)
-   Added a fix of [Bun `URL.canParse` arity](oven-sh/bun#9250)
-   Added a fix of Bun `SuppressedError` [extra arguments support](oven-sh/bun#9283) and [arity](oven-sh/bun#9282)
-   Compat data improvements:
    -   [`value` argument of `URLSearchParams.prototype.{ has, delete }`](https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-urlsearchparams-delete) marked as supported [from Bun 1.0.31](oven-sh/bun#9263)
    -   Added React Native 0.74 Hermes compat data, `Array.prototype.{ toSpliced, toReversed, with }` and `atob` marked as supported
    -   Added Deno 1.41.3 compat data mapping
    -   Added Opera Android 81 compat data mapping
    -   Added Samsung Internet 25 compat data mapping
    -   Added Oculus Quest Browser 32 compat data mapping
    -   Updated Electron 30 compat data mapping

### [`v3.36.0`](https://github.com/zloirock/core-js/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#3360---20240214)

[Compare Source](zloirock/core-js@v3.35.1...v3.36.0)

-   [`ArrayBuffer.prototype.transfer` and friends proposal](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-arraybuffer-transfer):
    -   Built-ins:
        -   `ArrayBuffer.prototype.detached`
        -   `ArrayBuffer.prototype.transfer`
        -   `ArrayBuffer.prototype.transferToFixedLength`
    -   Moved to stable ES, [Febrary 2024 TC39 meeting](tc39/proposals@c84d3dd)
    -   Added `es.` namespace modules, `/es/` and `/stable/` namespaces entries
-   [`Uint8Array` to / from base64 and hex proposal](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-arraybuffer-base64):
    -   Methods:
        -   `Uint8Array.fromBase64`
        -   `Uint8Array.fromHex`
        -   `Uint8Array.prototype.toBase64`
        -   `Uint8Array.prototype.toHex`
    -   Moved to stage 3, [Febrary 2024 TC39 meeting](tc39/proposals@278ab28)
    -   Added `/actual/` namespace entries
    -   Skipped adding new methods of writing to existing arrays to clarification some moments
-   [`Promise.try` proposal](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-promise-try) has been resurrected and moved to stage 2, [Febrary 2024 TC39 meeting](tc39/proposal-promise-try#15)
-   Added an entry point for [the new TC39 proposals stage](https://tc39.es/process-document/) - `core-js/stage/2.7` - still empty
-   Fixed regression in `Set.prototype.intersection` feature detection
-   Fixed a missed check in `Array.prototype.{ indexOf, lastIndexOf, includes }`, [#&#8203;1325](zloirock/core-js#1325), thanks [**@&#8203;minseok-choe**](https://github.com/minseok-choe)
-   Fixed a missed check in `Array.prototype.{ reduce, reduceRight }`, [#&#8203;1327](zloirock/core-js#1327), thanks [**@&#8203;minseok-choe**](https://github.com/minseok-choe)
-   Fixed `Array.from` and some other methods with proxy targets, [#&#8203;1322](zloirock/core-js#1322), thanks [**@&#8203;minseok-choe**](https://github.com/minseok-choe)
-   Fixed dependencies loading for modules from `ArrayBuffer.prototype.transfer` and friends proposal in some specific cases in IE10-
-   Dropped context workaround from collection static methods entries since with current methods semantic it's no longer required
-   Added instance methods polyfills to entries of collections static methods that produce collection instances
-   Added missed `Date.prototype.toJSON` to `JSON.stringify` entries dependencies
-   Added debugging info in some missed cases
-   Compat data improvements:
    -   [`{ Map, Object }.groupBy`](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-array-grouping), [`Promise.withResolvers`](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-promise-with-resolvers), [`ArrayBuffer.prototype.transfer` and friends](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-arraybuffer-transfer) marked as supported from [Safari 17.4](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safari-release-notes/safari-17\_4-release-notes#JavaScript)
    -   [New `Set` methods](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-set-methods) [fixed](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=14559#c4) and marked as supported from V8 ~ Chrome 123
    -   Added [Deno 1.40](https://deno.com/blog/v1.40) compat data mapping
    -   `Symbol.metadata` marked as supported from [Deno 1.40.4](https://github.com/denoland/deno/releases/tag/v1.40.4)
    -   Updated Electron 30 compat data mapping

</details>

---

### Configuration

📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

 - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNy4wLjAiLCJ1cGRhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNy4wLjAiLCJ0YXJnZXRCcmFuY2giOiJkZXZlbG9wIn0=-->

Reviewed-on: https://gitea.vylpes.xyz/RabbitLabs/Droplet/pulls/294
Reviewed-by: Vylpes <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <[email protected]>
Co-committed-by: Renovate Bot <[email protected]>
@gibson042
Copy link

I have reservations about Promise.try accepting variadic arguments that leave no room for ever specifying a receiver—setting it apart from Function.prototype.{apply,call} and Reflect.apply.

AsyncContext is also doing this for our run methods, so this won't be the only one.

Then the same concerns apply there: tc39/proposal-async-context#80

@gibson042 gibson042 mentioned this issue Apr 11, 2024
Open
@ljharb ljharb mentioned this issue May 1, 2024
Merged
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/ecma262 that referenced this issue May 14, 2024
@ljharb
Normative: add Promise.try (tc39#3327)
6562a42 
See tc39/proposal-promise-try#15
@ljharb ljharb mentioned this issue May 14, 2024
Merged
@BuloZB BuloZB mentioned this issue May 19, 2024
Open
@cb-sl cb-sl mentioned this issue May 20, 2024
Open
@julitabarelkowska julitabarelkowska mentioned this issue May 20, 2024
Open
@vinit-aikido vinit-aikido mentioned this issue May 20, 2024
Open
@Shimizu-Kanaden-sys Shimizu-Kanaden-sys mentioned this issue May 20, 2024
Open
@olokotoh olokotoh mentioned this issue May 21, 2024
Open
@snyk-io snyk-io bot mentioned this issue May 21, 2024
Open
@AndrzejSmrokowski AndrzejSmrokowski mentioned this issue May 22, 2024
Open
@marekful marekful mentioned this issue May 22, 2024
Closed
@snyk-io snyk-io bot mentioned this issue May 23, 2024
Open
@nejidevelops nejidevelops mentioned this issue Oct 2, 2024
Open
@larkinwang20 larkinwang20 mentioned this issue Oct 3, 2024
Open
@X-oss-byte X-oss-byte mentioned this issue Oct 3, 2024
Open
@nejidevelops nejidevelops mentioned this issue Oct 3, 2024
Open
@larkinwang20 larkinwang20 mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2024
Open
@nejidevelops nejidevelops mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2024
Open
@terrorizer1980 terrorizer1980 mentioned this issue Oct 5, 2024
Closed
This was referenced Oct 6, 2024
Open
Open
@ljharb ljharb closed this as completed in 53d3351 Oct 9, 2024
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/ecma262 that referenced this issue Oct 9, 2024
@ljharb
Normative: add Promise.try (tc39#3327)
3962904 
See tc39/proposal-promise-try#15
@arpitsourcefuse arpitsourcefuse mentioned this issue Oct 24, 2024
Open
@snyk-io snyk-io bot mentioned this issue Oct 25, 2024
Merged
@larkinwang20 larkinwang20 mentioned this issue Oct 27, 2024
Open
@zrrv zrrv mentioned this issue Oct 27, 2024
Open
@X-oss-byte X-oss-byte mentioned this issue Oct 28, 2024
Open
@nejidevelops nejidevelops mentioned this issue Oct 28, 2024
Open
@nfgallimore nfgallimore mentioned this issue Oct 29, 2024
Open
@nejidevelops nejidevelops mentioned this issue Oct 31, 2024
Open
@samul-1 samul-1 mentioned this issue Oct 31, 2024
Open
@marcusmcclure marcusmcclure mentioned this issue Nov 3, 2024
Open
@larkinwang20 larkinwang20 mentioned this issue Nov 3, 2024
Open
@X-oss-byte X-oss-byte mentioned this issue Nov 4, 2024
Open
This was referenced Nov 5, 2024
Open
Open
@snykshane snykshane mentioned this issue Nov 7, 2024
Open
@X-oss-byte X-oss-byte mentioned this issue Nov 11, 2024
Open
@nejidevelops nejidevelops mentioned this issue Nov 12, 2024
Open
@ykkjobner ykkjobner mentioned this issue Nov 12, 2024
Open
@jondmarien jondmarien mentioned this issue Nov 13, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@ljharb ljharb

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests