Should we have a Temporal [ @@toStringTag ] ??

[FrankYFTang]

In "Stage 2 Draft / June 15, 2021" version of https://tc39.es/proposal-temporal/#sec-constructor-properties-of-the-temporal-object

I see no section for "Temporal [ @@toStringTag ]"

Should we have one like other 262/402 top level object?
Ref

https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-math-@@tostringtag
21.3.1.9 Math [ @@toStringTag ]

https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-atomics-@@tostringtag
25.4.15 Atomics [ @@toStringTag ]

https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-json-@@tostringtag
25.5.3 JSON [ @@toStringTag ]

https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-reflect-@@tostringtag
28.1.14 Reflect [ @@toStringTag ]

https://tc39.es/ecma402/#sec-Intl-toStringTag
8.1.1 Intl[ @@toStringTag ]

[ljharb]

Yes, we absolutely should - good catch!

[ptomato]

Would Temporal.now need one as well?

[ljharb]

Good question! it’s not top-level, so maybe not - but it’s a namespace, so maybe yes?

In general it can’t hurt to add it, and would potentially help debugging - I’d vote for adding it if nobody has objections.

[ptomato]

I agree. It seems like "namespace objects should generally have a @@toStringTag" should be added to the guidance discussed in https://github.com/tc39/notes/blob/master/meetings/2021-05/may-26.md#discussion-of-globals-and-guidance-for-future-proposals ?

[ptomato]

Guidance question → tc39/how-we-work#93