Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v0.37.x: Unscheduled Runs shouldn't be included in full status #5295

Conversation

abayer
Copy link
Contributor

@abayer abayer commented Aug 9, 2022

Changes

Fixes #5282

When removing conditions, I accidentally made GetRunsStatus not skip including custom task ResolvedPipelineTasks without Runs in the PipelineRun.Status.Runs map. This resulted in cancellation failing, because the cancellation logic tries to patch each Run or TaskRun in the PipelineRun status (either in the Runs and TaskRuns maps for full embedded status, or ChildReferences for minimal or both embedded status). Unscheduled PipelineTasks for Tasks were already properly excluded from the status map, and ChildReferences was fine either way, but due to the oversight I mentioned above, unscheduled PipelineTasks for custom tasks were included in the full embedded status map, and cancellation would error due to that.

cherry-picked from #5287, with some additional modifications to child reference population for custom tasks without a Run which have been fixed in v0.38.x.

/kind bug

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • Has Docs included if any changes are user facing
  • Has Tests included if any functionality added or changed
  • Follows the commit message standard
  • Meets the Tekton contributor standards (including
    functionality, content, code)
  • Has a kind label. You can add one by adding a comment on this PR that contains /kind <type>. Valid types are bug, cleanup, design, documentation, feature, flake, misc, question, tep
  • Release notes block below has been updated with any user facing changes (API changes, bug fixes, changes requiring upgrade notices or deprecation warnings)
  • Release notes contains the string "action required" if the change requires additional action from users switching to the new release

Release Notes

Fix cancellation of PipelineRuns with unscheduled custom tasks.

Fixes tektoncd#5282

When removing conditions, I accidentally made `GetRunsStatus` not skip including custom task `ResolvedPipelineTask`s without `Run`s in the `PipelineRun.Status.Runs` map. This resulted in cancellation failing, because the cancellation logic tries to patch each `Run` or `TaskRun` in the `PipelineRun` status (either in the `Runs` and `TaskRuns` maps for full embedded status, or `ChildReferences` for minimal or both embedded status). Unscheduled `PipelineTask`s for `Task`s were already properly excluded from the status map, and `ChildReferences` was fine either way, but due to the oversight I mentioned above, unscheduled `PipelineTask`s for custom tasks _were_ included in the full embedded status map, and cancellation would error due to that.

cherry-picked from tektoncd#5287, with some additional modifications to child reference population for custom tasks without a `Run` which have been fixed in v0.38.x.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Bayer <[email protected]>
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Aug 9, 2022
@tekton-robot tekton-robot requested review from afrittoli and jerop August 9, 2022 19:12
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 9, 2022
@abayer abayer changed the title Unscheduled Runs shouldn't be included in full status v0.37.x: Unscheduled Runs shouldn't be included in full status Aug 9, 2022
@abayer
Copy link
Contributor Author

abayer commented Aug 9, 2022

@abayer abayer added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. and removed kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Aug 9, 2022
Copy link
Member

@afrittoli afrittoli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: afrittoli

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 9, 2022
@lbernick
Copy link
Member

lbernick commented Aug 9, 2022

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 9, 2022
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/pipelinerun/pipelinerun.go 85.7% 86.3% 0.6
pkg/reconciler/pipelinerun/resources/pipelinerunstate.go 97.8% 97.8% -0.0

@abayer
Copy link
Contributor Author

abayer commented Aug 9, 2022

/test check-pr-has-kind-label

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@abayer: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-alpha-integration-tests
  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-build-tests
  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests
  • /test tekton-pipeline-unit-tests

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/test check-pr-has-kind-label

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 4335ca0 into tektoncd:release-v0.37.x Aug 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants