-
Hey there, first of all, thanks for this cool action, it helps us a lot! We just wanted to expand our usage, but only want the issue manager to remove a label, not close the issue. One affected issue: safing/portmaster#75 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments
-
Here is the log output from the affected workflow run:
It clearly says 3650 days, but the last activity on safing/portmaster#75 is clearly younger. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ah, I think I got it now. This may actually be a duplicate of #14. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello, the delay is parsed by Pydantic: https://docs.pydantic.dev/latest/concepts/types/#datetime-types I think in Pydantic v1 it would parse integers up to some value as seconds, and above that value as milliseconds (I think as an effort to handle compatibility with JS milliseconds numbers by default). I think that's no longer like that in Pydantic v2. I tried checking your workflow but it seems it no longer uses issue-manager, so I suspect you handled your need already. 🤓 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hello, the delay is parsed by Pydantic: https://docs.pydantic.dev/latest/concepts/types/#datetime-types
I think in Pydantic v1 it would parse integers up to some value as seconds, and above that value as milliseconds (I think as an effort to handle compatibility with JS milliseconds numbers by default).
I think that's no longer like that in Pydantic v2.
I tried checking your workflow but it seems it no longer uses issue-manager, so I suspect you handled your need already. 🤓