Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bug: send_zc should be a MultiCQEFuture #175

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 17, 2022

Conversation

ollie-etl
Copy link
Contributor

Somewhere, in the myriad of refactorings that occurred in #123, I dropped the marker type. This leads to wrongly associating the Future for handling SingleCQE types with SendZc, which is a multi completion type.

@ollie-etl
Copy link
Contributor Author

@FrankReh @Noah-Kennedy could we get this fixed?

@ollie-etl ollie-etl changed the title bug: send_zc should be multi compeltion bug: send_zc should be a MultiCQEFuture Nov 17, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@FrankReh FrankReh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would a unit test have caught this, since we would have gotten more completions that were unexpected?

@FrankReh FrankReh merged commit 0d245cd into tokio-rs:master Nov 17, 2022
@ollie-etl
Copy link
Contributor Author

ollie-etl commented Nov 17, 2022

@FrankReh I just raised #176 for that. The answer is yes, but its unlikely the ci environment can run them currently

@ollie-etl ollie-etl mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants