Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⬆️ Upgrade traefik Docker tag to v2.9.9 #807

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2023
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 21, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
traefik patch v2.9.8 -> v2.9.9

Release Notes

traefik/traefik

v2.9.9

Compare Source

All Commits

Bug fixes:

Documentation:

  • [middleware] Clarify ratelimit middleware (#​9777 by mpl)
  • [tcp] Correcting variable name 'server address' in TCP Router (#​9743 by ralphg6)

v2.9.9

Compare Source

All Commits

Bug fixes:

Documentation:

  • [middleware] Clarify ratelimit middleware (#​9777 by mpl)
  • [tcp] Correcting variable name 'server address' in TCP Router (#​9743 by ralphg6)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@pavlospt
Copy link

Is this going to be merged? 🤔

@mloiseleur mloiseleur force-pushed the renovate/traefik-2.x branch from cb82149 to 70382e3 Compare March 28, 2023 08:27
@traefiker traefiker merged commit b263d22 into master Mar 28, 2023
@traefiker traefiker deleted the renovate/traefik-2.x branch March 28, 2023 08:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants