-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Transparent proxy #117
Comments
same as #102 ? |
no, not a tunnel. |
Yep. I know, this is another feature.
…On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 4:04 PM Limon Lin ***@***.***> wrote:
no, not a tunnel.
I need something like this: https://gist.github.com/wen-long/8644243
which use iptables to rediect packets, and clients through the router
won't aware any change.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#117 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABLyz5KgOAVxytst8GljRE0z52V-C5haks5s4TJwgaJpZM4Qj1rb>
.
|
you must install redsocks in route in order to a transparent proxy. I wish add the feature in Brook. |
This feature is implemented in v20180227. My situation:
Steps:
|
the feature is not available when using iptable redirect, ex |
How to deploy the firewall when brook is installed on Openwrt Route? |
@nuclearn Brook tproxy works on mangle table |
I run brook on my router. Is there any way to setup a transparent proxy easily, like ss-redir?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: