-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 299
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tests for loops over arrays #982
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #982 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 85.90% 85.90%
Complexity 2066 2066
=========================================
Files 83 83
Lines 6854 6854
Branches 1320 1320
=========================================
Hits 5888 5888
Misses 550 550
Partials 416 416 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
" }", | ||
" }", | ||
" for (String s : fizz) {", | ||
" // BUG: Diagnostic contains: dereferenced expression s is @Nullable", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting... wonder how we are representing the access paths here. Might be a bit much to ask (basically, you need NullAway to remember "we checked all elements of this array and they are all @NonNull
, therefore..."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, maybe we should clarify this test. It's a bit confusing due to the multiple loops in the same method. This was just meant to test that if the array contents are @Nullable
, the loop variable should be treated as @Nullable
(which it currently isn't; that why the test is ignored). I wasn't thinking about using reasoning from the previous loop to avoid warning on the second warning.
@armughan11 when you work on #983, please rewrite this test to reorder the loops, to avoid this confusion
This MR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [org.tukaani:xz](https://tukaani.org/xz/java.html) ([source](https://github.com/tukaani-project/xz-java)) | compile | minor | `1.9` -> `1.10` | | [org.eclipse:yasson](https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/ee4j.yasson) ([source](https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/yasson)) | compile | patch | `3.0.3` -> `3.0.4` | | [org.eclipse.parsson:parsson](https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/parsson) | compile | patch | `1.1.6` -> `1.1.7` | | [com.uber.nullaway:nullaway](https://github.com/uber/NullAway) | | patch | `0.11.0` -> `0.11.1` | | [io.hosuaby:inject-resources-junit-jupiter](https://github.com/hosuaby/inject-resources) | test | patch | `0.3.3` -> `0.3.5` | | [org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin](https://www.mojohaus.org/exec-maven-plugin) ([source](https://github.com/mojohaus/exec-maven-plugin)) | build | minor | `3.3.0` -> `3.4.0` | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>tukaani-project/xz-java</summary> ### [`v1.10`](https://github.com/tukaani-project/xz-java/releases/tag/v1.10): XZ for Java 1.10 [Compare Source](tukaani-project/xz-java@v1.9...v1.10) </details> <details> <summary>eclipse-ee4j/yasson</summary> ### [`v3.0.4`](eclipse-ee4j/yasson@3.0.3...3.0.4) [Compare Source](eclipse-ee4j/yasson@3.0.3...3.0.4) </details> <details> <summary>eclipse-ee4j/parsson</summary> ### [`v1.1.7`](eclipse-ee4j/parsson@1.1.6...1.1.7) [Compare Source](eclipse-ee4j/parsson@1.1.6...1.1.7) </details> <details> <summary>uber/NullAway</summary> ### [`v0.11.1`](https://github.com/uber/NullAway/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#Version-0111) [Compare Source](uber/NullAway@v0.11.0...v0.11.1) - Fix issue 1008 ([#​1009](uber/NullAway#1009)) - JSpecify: read upper bound annotations from bytecode and add tests ([#​1004](uber/NullAway#1004)) - Fix crash with suggested suppressions in JSpecify mode ([#​1001](uber/NullAway#1001)) - Update to JSpecify 1.0 and use JSpecify annotations in NullAway code ([#​1000](uber/NullAway#1000)) - Expose [@​EnsuresNonNull](https://github.com/EnsuresNonNull) and [@​RequiresNonNull](https://github.com/RequiresNonNull) in annotations package ([#​999](uber/NullAway#999)) - Don't report initializer warnings on [@​NullUnmarked](https://github.com/NullUnmarked) constructors / methods ([#​997](uber/NullAway#997)) - Strip annotations from MethodSymbol strings ([#​993](uber/NullAway#993)) - JSpecify: fix crashes where declared parameter / return types were raw ([#​989](uber/NullAway#989)) - JSpecify: Handle [@​nullable](https://github.com/nullable) elements for enhanced-for-loops on arrays ([#​986](uber/NullAway#986)) - Features/944 tidy stream nullability propagator ([#​985](uber/NullAway#985)) - Tests for loops over arrays ([#​982](uber/NullAway#982)) - Bug fixes for array subtyping at returns / parameter passing ([#​980](uber/NullAway#980)) - JSpecify: Handle [@​nonnull](https://github.com/nonnull) elements in [@​nullable](https://github.com/nullable) content arrays ([#​963](uber/NullAway#963)) - Don't report [@​nullable](https://github.com/nullable) type argument errors for unmarked classes ([#​958](uber/NullAway#958)) - External Library Models: Adding support for Nullable upper bounds of Generic Type parameters ([#​949](uber/NullAway#949)) - Refactoring / code cleanups: - Test on JDK 22 ([#​992](uber/NullAway#992)) - Add test case for [@​nullable](https://github.com/nullable) Void with override in JSpecify mode ([#​990](uber/NullAway#990)) - Enable UnnecessaryFinal and PreferredInterfaceType EP checks ([#​991](uber/NullAway#991)) - Add missing [@​test](https://github.com/test) annotation ([#​988](uber/NullAway#988)) - Fix typo in variable name ([#​987](uber/NullAway#987)) - Remove AbstractConfig class ([#​974](uber/NullAway#974)) - Fix Javadoc for MethodRef ([#​973](uber/NullAway#973)) - Refactored data clumps with the help of LLMs (research project) ([#​960](uber/NullAway#960)) - Build / CI tooling maintenance: - Various cleanups enabled by bumping minimum Java and Error Prone versions ([#​962](uber/NullAway#962)) - Disable publishing of snapshot builds from CI ([#​967](uber/NullAway#967)) - Update Gradle action usage in CI workflow ([#​969](uber/NullAway#969)) - Update Gradle config to always compile Java code using JDK 17 ([#​971](uber/NullAway#971)) - Update JavaParser to 3.26.0 ([#​970](uber/NullAway#970)) - Reenable JMH benchmarking in a safer manner ([#​975](uber/NullAway#975)) - Updated JMH Benchmark Comment Action ([#​976](uber/NullAway#976)) - Update to Gradle 8.8 ([#​981](uber/NullAway#981)) - Update to Error Prone 2.28.0 ([#​984](uber/NullAway#984)) - Update to Gradle 8.9 ([#​998](uber/NullAway#998)) - Update to WALA 1.6.6 ([#​1003](uber/NullAway#1003)) </details> <details> <summary>hosuaby/inject-resources</summary> ### [`v0.3.5`](hosuaby/inject-resources@v0.3.4...v0.3.5) [Compare Source](hosuaby/inject-resources@v0.3.4...v0.3.5) ### [`v0.3.4`](hosuaby/inject-resources@v0.3.3...v0.3.4) [Compare Source](hosuaby/inject-resources@v0.3.3...v0.3.4) </details> <details> <summary>mojohaus/exec-maven-plugin</summary> ### [`v3.4.0`](https://github.com/mojohaus/exec-maven-plugin/releases/tag/3.4.0) [Compare Source](mojohaus/exec-maven-plugin@3.3.0...3.4.0) <!-- Optional: add a release summary here --> #### 🚀 New features and improvements - Allow `<includePluginDependencies>` to be specified for the exec:exec goal ([#​432](mojohaus/exec-maven-plugin#432)) [@​sebthom](https://github.com/sebthom) #### 🐛 Bug Fixes - Do not get UPPERCASE env vars ([#​427](mojohaus/exec-maven-plugin#427)) [@​wheezil](https://github.com/wheezil) #### 📦 Dependency updates - Bump org.codehaus.mojo:mojo-parent from 82 to 84 ([#​434](mojohaus/exec-maven-plugin#434)) [@​dependabot](https://github.com/dependabot) - Bump org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-xml from 3.0.0 to 3.0.1 ([#​431](mojohaus/exec-maven-plugin#431)) [@​dependabot](https://github.com/dependabot) #### 👻 Maintenance - Remove Log4j 1.2.x from ITs ([#​437](mojohaus/exec-maven-plugin#437)) [@​slawekjaranowski](https://github.com/slawekjaranowski) #### 🔧 Build - Use Maven 3.9.7 and 4.0.0-beta-3 ([#​433](mojohaus/exec-maven-plugin#433)) [@​slawekjaranowski](https://github.com/slawekjaranowski) </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Enabled. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever MR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 👻 **Immortal**: This MR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get [config help](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/discussions) if that's undesired. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this MR, check this box --- This MR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNC4yNC4wIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiMzQuMjQuMCJ9-->
We handle a loop with an index variable correctly, but not a for-each loop over an array, which needs to be fixed in a follow-up (see #983)