-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handle pathological cases more consistently #1651
Closed
Closed
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7890383
Do not run tbs that request an exit
rhelmot a2a5db9
Do not only lift blocks with only 1 insn just because there is no phy…
rhelmot 4a8af17
Do not call write callback twice for same address in same write
rhelmot 33c488b
Add test case for unaligned write callbacks
rhelmot d9d91df
Add testcase for blocks being lifted on jump into unmapped mem
rhelmot b459b42
Make unaligned reads not trigger recursive callbacks
rhelmot File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried your patch but I failed to understand the change here. Any reproduction code?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you asking for a testcase?
The meaning of the original code is to set the count bitfield of the cflags to 1 (only lift 1 instruction) and set the CF_NOCACHE bit (do not cache the tb). The new code performs only the latter change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's better if a testcase could be provided so that I can understand it better. My question is that, why setting the count to 1 solves the problem?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're misunderstanding the order of the diff - the old code set the count to 1, and this was undesired behavior because then it would only lift one instruction. Presumably the old code optimizes guests using exceptional control flow, but it produces inaccurate metrics (block counts).