Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(pkg): Minor fixes affecting packaging kernel #1967

Conversation

nderjung
Copy link
Member

  • fix(pkg): Prioritize kernel packaging
  • feat(pkg): Intelligently handle architecture in --plat flag

Prerequisite checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines regarding submitting new changes to the project;
  • Tested your changes against relevant architectures and platforms;
  • Ran make fmt on your commit series before opening this PR;
  • Updated relevant documentation.

Description of changes

This commit re-orders the kernel packager to be first such that
it can be used in the context of an existing working directory.
Since the kernel is a known flag, we can safely assume that
the user knows what they are doing and can allow them to
manipulate the package manager directly.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Jung <[email protected]>
@nderjung nderjung force-pushed the nderjung/fix/internal/cli/kraft/pkg/prioritize-kernel branch from 2e0bc5c to 5b3a40c Compare November 21, 2024 18:01
@nderjung nderjung requested review from razvand and removed request for craciunoiuc November 21, 2024 18:51
@nderjung nderjung assigned razvand and unassigned craciunoiuc Nov 21, 2024
Copy link
Member

@craciunoiuc craciunoiuc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All good here. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Cezar Craciunoiu [email protected]
Approved-by: Cezar Craciunoiu [email protected]

@craciunoiuc craciunoiuc merged commit c204c38 into unikraft:staging Nov 21, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants