added instance_id read from coco json if no segmentation #729
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I added an way to read instance_id from a coco json file only if there's no segmentation. I guess it can be extended to segmentation classes as well.
I tested it and it works, however the visualization of the IDs in the web interface depends on the browser somehow. It's no visible if I open a image to label in firefox under linux. Interestingly, if I use firefox under windows or chrome under linux then I can see the tracking IDs with the bounding boxes. Somehow firefox under linux is not loading them.
This image is taken from firefox under linux:
while this other is from chromium under linux:
