-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement web server as the request handler for edge SSR #33635
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
huozhi
reviewed
Jan 25, 2022
huozhi
reviewed
Jan 25, 2022
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
huozhi
reviewed
Jan 25, 2022
huozhi
previously approved these changes
Jan 25, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work 👍
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
huozhi
approved these changes
Jan 25, 2022
Stats from current PRDefault Build (Increase detected
|
vercel/next.js canary | shuding/next.js shu/504f | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
buildDuration | 18.1s | 15.6s | -2.4s |
buildDurationCached | 4s | 4s | |
nodeModulesSize | 356 MB | 356 MB |
Page Load Tests Overall increase ✓
vercel/next.js canary | shuding/next.js shu/504f | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
/ failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/ total time (seconds) | 4.134 | 3.768 | -0.37 |
/ avg req/sec | 604.75 | 663.43 | +58.68 |
/error-in-render failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/error-in-render total time (seconds) | 2.121 | 1.779 | -0.34 |
/error-in-render avg req/sec | 1178.66 | 1404.94 | +226.28 |
Client Bundles (main, webpack, commons)
vercel/next.js canary | shuding/next.js shu/504f | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
450.HASH.js gzip | 179 B | 179 B | ✓ |
framework-HASH.js gzip | 42.2 kB | 42.2 kB | ✓ |
main-HASH.js gzip | 27.2 kB | 27.2 kB | ✓ |
webpack-HASH.js gzip | 1.44 kB | 1.44 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 71 kB | 71 kB | ✓ |
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary | shuding/next.js shu/504f | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
polyfills-HASH.js gzip | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary | shuding/next.js shu/504f | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_app-HASH.js gzip | 1.37 kB | 1.37 kB | ✓ |
_error-HASH.js gzip | 194 B | 194 B | ✓ |
amp-HASH.js gzip | 312 B | 312 B | ✓ |
css-HASH.js gzip | 326 B | 326 B | ✓ |
dynamic-HASH.js gzip | 2.37 kB | 2.37 kB | ✓ |
head-HASH.js gzip | 350 B | 350 B | ✓ |
hooks-HASH.js gzip | 919 B | 919 B | ✓ |
image-HASH.js gzip | 4.94 kB | 4.94 kB | ✓ |
index-HASH.js gzip | 263 B | 263 B | ✓ |
link-HASH.js gzip | 2.19 kB | 2.19 kB | ✓ |
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip | 321 B | 321 B | ✓ |
script-HASH.js gzip | 383 B | 383 B | ✓ |
withRouter-HASH.js gzip | 318 B | 318 B | ✓ |
85e02e95b279..7e3.css gzip | 107 B | 107 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 14.4 kB | 14.4 kB | ✓ |
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary | shuding/next.js shu/504f | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_buildManifest.js gzip | 460 B | 460 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 460 B | 460 B | ✓ |
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary | shuding/next.js shu/504f | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
index.html gzip | 531 B | 531 B | ✓ |
link.html gzip | 545 B | 545 B | ✓ |
withRouter.html gzip | 526 B | 526 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 1.6 kB | 1.6 kB | ✓ |
Default Build with SWC (Increase detected ⚠️ )
General Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary | shuding/next.js shu/504f | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
buildDuration | 19.1s | 20.4s | |
buildDurationCached | 4.1s | 4.1s | |
nodeModulesSize | 356 MB | 356 MB |
Page Load Tests Overall increase ✓
vercel/next.js canary | shuding/next.js shu/504f | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
/ failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/ total time (seconds) | 3.65 | 3.637 | -0.01 |
/ avg req/sec | 684.88 | 687.41 | +2.53 |
/error-in-render failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/error-in-render total time (seconds) | 1.729 | 1.648 | -0.08 |
/error-in-render avg req/sec | 1445.94 | 1517.13 | +71.19 |
Client Bundles (main, webpack, commons)
vercel/next.js canary | shuding/next.js shu/504f | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
450.HASH.js gzip | 179 B | 179 B | ✓ |
framework-HASH.js gzip | 42.3 kB | 42.3 kB | ✓ |
main-HASH.js gzip | 27.3 kB | 27.3 kB | ✓ |
webpack-HASH.js gzip | 1.44 kB | 1.44 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 71.3 kB | 71.3 kB | ✓ |
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary | shuding/next.js shu/504f | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
polyfills-HASH.js gzip | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary | shuding/next.js shu/504f | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_app-HASH.js gzip | 1.35 kB | 1.35 kB | ✓ |
_error-HASH.js gzip | 180 B | 180 B | ✓ |
amp-HASH.js gzip | 305 B | 305 B | ✓ |
css-HASH.js gzip | 321 B | 321 B | ✓ |
dynamic-HASH.js gzip | 2.36 kB | 2.36 kB | ✓ |
head-HASH.js gzip | 342 B | 342 B | ✓ |
hooks-HASH.js gzip | 911 B | 911 B | ✓ |
image-HASH.js gzip | 4.97 kB | 4.97 kB | ✓ |
index-HASH.js gzip | 256 B | 256 B | ✓ |
link-HASH.js gzip | 2.21 kB | 2.21 kB | ✓ |
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip | 314 B | 314 B | ✓ |
script-HASH.js gzip | 375 B | 375 B | ✓ |
withRouter-HASH.js gzip | 309 B | 309 B | ✓ |
85e02e95b279..7e3.css gzip | 107 B | 107 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 14.3 kB | 14.3 kB | ✓ |
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary | shuding/next.js shu/504f | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_buildManifest.js gzip | 459 B | 459 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 459 B | 459 B | ✓ |
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary | shuding/next.js shu/504f | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
index.html gzip | 529 B | 529 B | ✓ |
link.html gzip | 543 B | 543 B | ✓ |
withRouter.html gzip | 525 B | 525 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 1.6 kB | 1.6 kB | ✓ |
This was referenced Jan 27, 2022
This change seems to have caused #34185. |
natew
pushed a commit
to natew/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2022
(vercel#31506 for context) This PR implements the minimum viable web server on top of the Next.js base server, and integrates it into our middleware (edge) SSR runtime to handle all the requests. This also addresses problems like missing dynamic routes support in our current handler. Note that this is the initial implementation with the assumption that the web server is running under minimal mode. Also later we can refactor the `__server_context` environment to properly passing the context via the constructor or methods.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
(#31506 for context)
This PR implements the minimum viable web server on top of the Next.js base server, and integrates it into our middleware (edge) SSR runtime to handle all the requests.
This also addresses problems like missing dynamic routes support in our current handler.
Note that this is the initial implementation with the assumption that the web server is running under minimal mode. Also later we can refactor the
__server_context
environment to properly passing the context via the constructor or methods.