Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Specify service:base template value for infotech model elements #4054

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

Cisphyx
Copy link
Contributor

@Cisphyx Cisphyx commented Jan 6, 2025

No description provided.

@Cisphyx Cisphyx mentioned this pull request Jan 6, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.41%. Comparing base (c926109) to head (98ccb8e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4054      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.48%   96.41%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         256      256              
  Lines       59645    59645              
==========================================
- Hits        57550    57504      -46     
- Misses       2095     2141      +46     
Flag Coverage Δ
linux 96.41% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
linux_replay ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte added this to the v2.193.0 milestone Jan 6, 2025
@vEpiphyte vEpiphyte added enhancement model Data model related change labels Jan 6, 2025
@Cisphyx Cisphyx merged commit 5b93678 into master Jan 6, 2025
5 checks passed
@Cisphyx Cisphyx deleted the object-templatevals branch January 6, 2025 22:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement model Data model related change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants